Epstein Secrets

ir identity will be indicated by their Initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disclosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court wil

IAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00180857 13 1 whether this nonprosecution agreement 2 should be released to the plaintiffs for 3 their use. 4 Judge Marra heard two hearings on this matter and the court has those orders. 6 And in the first hearing Judge Marra very, 7 very, carefully balanced the 8

released to the plaintiffs for 3 their use. 4 Judge Marra heard two hearings on this matter and the court

onclu- sion that the guardian's sua sponte decision to hire counsel in this case, presumably at the expense of the parties, was highly im- proper. Fla.App. 3 Dist.,1999. Perez v. Perez 769 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 END OF DOCUMENT 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disdosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court will

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

conclu- sion that the guardian's sua sponse decision to hire counsel in this case, presumably at the expense of the parties, was highly im- ProPer- Fla.App. 3 Dist..1999. Perez v. Perez 769 So.2d 389,24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 END OF DOCUMENT Q 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON ADELQUI.LBENAVENTE rmukumALINVBSTIOMOR

esent controversy but which might possibly lead to evidence supporting some subsequent cause of action is quashed. COBB and PETERSON, IL, concur. Fla.App. 5 Dist.,2001. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 2 http://web2.westlaw

Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON ADELQUI.LBENAVENTE rmemeom. I INVBSTIOM

esent controversy but which might possibly lead to evidence supporting some subsequent cause of action is quashed. COBB and PETERSON, IL, concur. Fla.App. 5 Dist.,2001. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.corn/pr