Epstein Secrets

cases are pending against Mr Epstein in Florida slate and federal courts In May 2009, the related federal court cases were consolidated before Judge Kenneth Marra for discovery and procedural purposes. Judge Marra directed that witnesses common to the multiple cases would be deposed only once. Undersigned cou

deral courts In May 2009, the related federal court cases were consolidated before Judge Kenneth Marra for discovery and procedural purposes. Judge Marra directed that witnesses common to the multiple cases would be deposed only once. Undersigned counsel understands from conversations with counsel for

eth Marra for discovery and procedural purposes. Judge Marra directed that witnesses common to the multiple ca

tment Record Custodian (collectively 'Town of Palm Beach Police Officers"), hereby move to quash the subpoena or for a protective order pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(c) directing that discovery sought by the civil subpoenas for deposition issued by Plaintiff, B.B , and the cross-notices with subp

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disclosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court wil

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, M. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.230, for leave to intervene as a party in Mr. Epstein's criminal matter for the following reasons: 1. Applicant's intervention is in

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disdosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court will

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, ■. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.230, for leave to intervene as a party in Mr. Epstein's criminal matter for the following reasons: 1. Applicant's intervention is in

g the case that he did was because of his perception as to why the federal court case was brought but never served that met with an order of Judge Marra, as I understand, of dismissal, Mr. Edwards may need to explain that. But that's not before me here. What's Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. E

ought but never served that met with an order of Judge Marra, as I understand, of dismissal, Mr. Edwards may

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 way, that the court should grant us the access to the information. That's in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(4), and in Genovese versus Provident Life 74 So.3d 1064 Florida Supreme Court 2011. It's also established, Judge, under the la

ions to Epstein's Motion to Compel and/or Identify. This Notice should only be filed in 08-80119, not in all of the Epstein cases.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/20/2009. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (1c3) (Entered: 05/20/2009) 05/22/2009 15 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruc

No. 102 v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Member case: (View

the court reasoned that the purpose of discovery is to eliminate the likelihood of surprise and to Insure a fair opportunity to prepare for trial. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1)• see also Surf Drugs. Inc.. v. Vermette 236 So.2d 108, 111 (Fla. 7 EFTA00175217 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 5 Entere

oe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON EFTA00317246 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do

e theory of the requestor's case, or to some significant aspect of the case); Ashemimry v. Ba Nafa, 847 So.2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). In addition, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(3), does allow discovery of fact work product where the requesting party can show need and the inability to obtain the substantia