Epstein Secrets

ilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States

18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I know, Judge Man has not ever seen the agreement or these notification letters.... 1 don't know if t

osecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I know, Judge Marra has not ever seen the agreement or these notification letters.... I don't know if

osecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I know, Judge Marra has not ever seen the agreement or these notification letters.... I don't know if

osecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I know, Judge Marra has not ever seen the agreement or these notification letters.... I don't know if

osecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I

00076 (Exhibit II); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MR 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); REP WPB 000235-000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); REP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

dberger: Today, Dexter Lee and I appeared before Judge Marra in connection with a suit filed by wand assertin

Cc: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Nonce of Disclosure Dear Mr. Goldberger: Today, Dexter Lee and I appeared before Judge Marra in connection with a suit filed by wand asserting that their rights as victims were breached by our failure to consult with them belbrc entering int

ficer. 1) SIGNATURE DATE SIONAT RE IOU U 4Ily. .r. RECEIVED BY REASON i r DATE/TIME RECEIVED • - •-__-, • . . ' :-:' ... • Y pi , . RFP WPB 00048.6 - • EFTA00185092 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-50 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 8 of 10 —a. Y. I r e n. ALT POPO Veen

n of any party. Whether Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k) applies to this oivil litigation is a question of law for resolution by Judge Marra. Accordingly, we axe abiding by our ethical obligation to advise the Court of its statutory mandate wider Section 3509(k). Finally, thank you for n

itigation is a question of law for resolution by Judge Marra. Accordingly, we axe abiding by our ethical oblig

n or to discuss this matter in any way. Until then, I remain, • Very truly yours, Michael R. Thin cc; Jack Goldberger, Esq. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000547 ••• • •I•MPISIM EFTA00185097 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 122 EFTA0

'21 PM To: '; 'Roy BLACK' Cc: nson, aren I • S) Subject: Hearing with Judge Marra Dear Jay and Roy: We just finished our hearing with Judge Marra. He has ordered us to make the Agreement available to the plaintiffs in this case pursuant to a protective order limiting the disclosure to the vict

Cc: nson, aren I • S) Subject: Hearing with Judge Marra Dear Jay and Roy: We just finished our hearing

l restitution aspects of the Agreement can be fulfilled. Sincerely. te 1.elkowuz cc: Karen Atkinson. Chief. Northern Division 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000583 EFTA00185165 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-62 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 132 EFTA00185166 Case 9:08-c

federal prosecutorial authority. IO 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001653 EFTA00209832 KIRKLAND & ELLIS

t of Florida to discontinue its involvement in this matter, and return responsibility for this case to the State of Florida. 17 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001686 EFTA00209865 Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Jay Lefkowitz [[email protected]] Sent: y, September 27, 2007 2:53 PM To: ,

es: The most recent court decision to carefully review the Justice Department's position is Jane Does #1 and #2 v. United States, No. 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON (S.D. Fla. Sept. 26, 2011). In that case, the court flatly rejected the Department's claim that rights attach only after charges are formall

second charge of assaulting a different co-conspirator. DE 361 at 13-14,1 24 (citing US_Atty_Cor. at 29 (Exhibit 54); RFP WPB 000122 (Exhibit 55); RFP WPB 000125-000126 (Exhibit 56); RFP WA 000281 (Exhibit 57)). In response, the Government does not contend that the victims lack factual support for the

rkland-Ellift on '11/26/2007 >>>. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RIP WPB 000235 EFTA00184331 Case 9:08-cv-8073

se, the United States Attorney will furnish Epstein with notice specifying the conditions of the Agreement that he has violated. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000108 EFTA00184343 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 7 Terms of the Agreement: 1. Epstein shal