Epstein Secrets

onfidentiality clause, precluding it from EFTA00180632 being disclosed to third parties or made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to third parties. 3. Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judge Deborah Pucillo ordered Mr. Epstein's attorney

he court. (A-16:2; A-18:43). The court ruled that "[t]his Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders." (A-16:3). Subsequent to this oral ruling, Mr. Epstein provided the court with a Motion for Stay (A-14). The court stayed disclosu

frey Epstein is hereby ordered to be unsealed. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of , 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Copies furnished to: all counsel of record EFTA00180700 a I EFTA00180701 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 29 E

made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to

o motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (c)(9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954 So. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing

onfidentiality clause, precluding it from EFTA00232246 being disclosed to third parties or made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to third parties. 3. Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judge Deborah Pucillo ordered Mr. Epstein's attorney

he court. (A-16:2; A-18:43). The court ruled that "[t]his Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous a d‘rs." (A-16.3). Subsulticnt to this oral ruling, M. Epstein provided the court with a Motion for Stay (A-14). The court stayed disclosu

py of that acknowledgment to the USAO. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 21" day of August, 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: all counsel of record By signing below, 1 certify that I have reviewed and agree to be bound by

made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to

o motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (c)(9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954 So. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing

0 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331619 EFTA_00204345 EFTA02729331 opposed disclosure (A-2). On August 16, 2008, Judge Marra of the Southern District ordered the United States Attorney's Office to produce the non-prosecution agreement to the Does' attorneys and to any oth

223 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331622 EFTA 00204348 EFTA02729334 permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders." (A-16:3). Subsequent to this oral ruling, Mr. Epstein provided the court with a Motion to Stay (A-14). The court stayed disclosur

1 opposed disclosure (A-2). On August 16, 2008, Judge Marra of the Southern District ordered the United Stat

o motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (c)(9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud, Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954 So. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing

onfidentiality clause, precluding it from EFTA00231126 being disclosed to third parties or made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to third parties. 3. Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judge Deborah Pucillo ordered Mr. Epstein's attorney

; A-18:43). The court ruled that "[t]his Order is in no way to be interpreted as 6 EFTA00231138 permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders." (A-16:3). Subsequent to this oral ruling, Mr. Epstein provided the court with a Motion to Stay (A-14). The court stayed disclosur

made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to

to motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (cX9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954.. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing of

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fe

itigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that

e Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 52510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipie

ral part of the civil proceeding, particularly when the condition is asserted as an issue by the party seeking closure” (emphasis added)). Il. JUDGE MARRA’S ORDER IN HIS CASE DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT THE RECORDS BE SEALED IN THIS CASE. Dershowitz also appears to contend that Judge Marra’s order striking s

he party seeking closure” (emphasis added)). Il. JUDGE MARRA’S ORDER IN HIS CASE DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT THE REC

ounting the overarching principle that “t]he public shall have access to all records of the judicial branch of government, except as provided below.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(a). This rule is a codification of the Florida Supreme Court’s admonition that a “a strong presumption of openness exists for all court