Epstein Secrets

tempted to join the action as "Jane Doe 3." While Judge Marra denied her motion to join, he specifically held

sell and Mr. Edwards represent not only Jane Doe I and 2 in that case, but also Ms. — who attempted to join the action as "Jane Doe 3." While Judge Marra denied her motion to join, he specifically held that Jane Doe 3 "can participate in this litigated effort to vindicate the rights of similarly situ

identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: (303) 831-7364 Fax: (303) 832-2628 Email: Imenningerehmflaw.com Email: jpagliuca@hmflaw.

ould have "shed tremendous public light on Epstein and other powerful individuals." Id. at 6-7. As and her lawyers expected, before District Judge Marra in the CVRA action could strike the "lurid details" of allegations in the joinder motion, members of the media obtained copies of the motion, prin

7. As and her lawyers expected, before District Judge Marra in the CVRA action could strike the "lurid detai

HE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT BECAUSE THE ALLEGED MISSTATEMENTS ARE NOT PERJURIOUS AS A MATTER OF LAW Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA0009737

in which Ms. Maxwell and others were given immunity from prosecution. • That these statements, ultimately stricken by United States District Court Marra, were widely publicized. • Ms. Maxwell, through her lawyer in London, issued a response that claims in the CVRA pleading were "obvious lies." •

MOTION FOR A SEVERANCE OF AND SEPARATE TRIAL ON COUNTS FIVE AND SIX OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Phone: Christian R. Everdell COHEN & DRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwel

in which Ms. Maxwell and others were given immunity from prosecution. • That these statements, ultimately stricken by United States District Court Marra, were widely publicized. • Ms. Maxwell, through her lawyer in London, issued a response that claims in the CVRA pleading were "obvious lies." •

MOTION FOR A SEVERANCE OF AND SEPARATE TRIAL ON COUNTS FIVE AND SIX OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Phone: Christian R. Everdell COHEN & DRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwel