Epstein Secrets

cret while prosecutors told victims that a case against Mr. Epstein was still possible, violated the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act, ruled Judge Kenneth A. Marra of Federal District Court in West Palm Beach, Fla. He gave the government and the two victims who sued 15 days to discuss what remedy should apply

se; because prosecutors did not notify them about the deal in advance, they were unable to object before it went into effect. In his ruling, Judge Marra called it "particularly problematic" that the government had concealed the existence of the 2008 agreement and misled the victims "to believe that f

ject before it went into effect. In his ruling, Judge Marra called it "particularly problematic" that the gov

ors told victims that a case against Mr. Epstein was still possible, violated the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act, ruled Judge Kenneth A. Marra of Federal District Court in West Palm Beach, Fla. He gave the government and the two victims who sued 15 days to discuss what remedy should apply in the case. Federal pros

arra. 4. On 411k 25, 009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders 0 in this matter of hic

ARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. O C. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Fl In der Seal- Civ-Marra), Kenneth A. Marra, Judge. PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS Petitioners, EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, by and through their undersigned counsel, fi

3. This nutter is pen4t, Ifore the Honorable United States District Court Judge, Kenneth Marra. 4. On 411k 25, 009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders 0 in this matter of hich are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. t forth in the Orders, Judge Mama order

lent court 10 EFTA00795633 ' • 4 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately S23 million. The fraudulent co

Rothstein's scheme went so far as to manufacture false and fraudulent Court opinions/orders including forging the signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11th Circuit in other cases. It is not yet known if he forged similar documents in Esptein related mat

This matter is pending before the Honorable United States District Court Judge, Kenneth Marra. 4. On March 25, 20O9 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 5. As set forth in the Orders, J

ra. 4. On March 25, 20O9 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies o

fraudulent court 10 EFTA00729449 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

Rothstein's scheme went so far as to manufacture false and fraudulent Court opinions/orders including forging the signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11th Circuit in other cases. It is not yet known if he forged similar documents in Esptein related mat

This matter is pending before the Honorable United States District Court Judge, Kenneth Marra. 4. On March 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 5. _ As set forth in the Orders,

ra. 4. On March 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies o

raudulent court 10 EFTA00223313 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

ttlement Conference, or in the Alternative, Motion to Direct Parties back to Mediation, Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-CV-80893 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2010) (Marra, J.) (doc. #168) attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Notably, Epstein sought this settlement conference — and ultimately made his payments as a result

there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe's case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein simply chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

n, if Epstein had thought that there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe's case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein simply chose to settle that case. He is therefor

is pending in federal court, aimed at vacating the federal plea agreement on the grounds that it violated victims' rights-WA On An it 7, 2015, Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the allegations made by alleged victim I I against Prince Andrew had no bearing on the lawsuit by alleged victims seeking to reopen Ep

to reopen Epstein's non-prosecution plea agreement with the federal government; the judge ordered that 11 to be struck from the record. all Judge Marra made no ruling as to whether claims by are true or false. Though he did not allow Jane Does 3 and 4 to join the suit, Marra specifically said that

at age 14.1'733 , et al. v. Epstein's estate (2019) Five women , and an unidentified woman), represented by David Boies, sued Epstein's estate in Federal District Court in Manhattan in November 2019, accusing him of rape, battery and false imprisonment and seeking unspecified damages.[IN Jane Doe 15 v. Epstein's e

Rothstein's scheme went so far as to manufacture false and fraudulent Court opinions/orders including forging the signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11th Circuit in other cases. It is not yet known if he forged similar documents in Esptein related mat

he signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11t

raudulent court 10 EFTA00596534 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

he signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11t

Rothstein's scheme went so far as to manufacture false and fraudulent Court opinions/orders including forging the signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11th Circuit in other cases. It is not yet known if he forged similar documents in Esptein related mat

raudulent court 10 EFTA00193860 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of

presentative to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto. The parties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge Edward B. Davis should be that independent third-party. Ultimately, Judge Davis selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Or

nior, Robert (USAFLS) please review 08-80736-CV-MARRA se EXHIBIT B-128 P-014955 EFTA00225342 U.S.

sentative to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto as Tab arties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge E B. should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge selecte o ert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Or