Epstein Secrets

ubject to a Protective Order. During the hearing, Judge Marra made clear that he wanted the U.S. Attorney's Of

tion under the rules of a tribunal . . ." In connection with litigation filed by two victims against the U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ordered the United States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non- Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. During the

ited States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non- Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. During the hearing, Judge Marra made clear that he wanted the U.S. Attorney's Office to communicate his order to all of the identified victims, not just the plaintiffs in the suit

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part,

tion under the rules of a tribunal . . ." In connection with litigation filed by two victims against the U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ordered the United States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non- Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. During the

ited States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non- Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. During the hearing, Judge Marra made clear that he wanted the U.S. Attorney's Office to communicate his order to all of the identified victims, not just the plaintiffs in the suit

ubject to a Protective Order. During the hearing, Judge Marra made clear that he wanted the U.S. Attorney's Of

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part,

tion under the rules of a tribunal . . ." In connection with litigation filed by two victims against the U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ordered the United States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non- Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. During the

ited States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non- Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. During the hearing, Judge Marra made clear that he wanted the U.S. Attorney's Office to communicate his order to all of the identified victims, not just the plaintiffs in the suit

ubject to a Protective Order. During the hearing, Judge Marra made clear that he wanted the U.S. Attorney's Of

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part,

tion under the rules of a tribunal . . ." In connection with litigation filed by two victims against the U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ordered the United States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non-Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. ag During

States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non-Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. ag During the hearing, Judge Marra made clear that he wanted the U.S. Attorney's Office to communicate his order to all of the identified victims, not just the plaintiffs in the suit

ct to a Protective Order. ag During the hearing, Judge Marra made clear that he wanted the U.S. Attorney's Of

whom had not yet been notified. I have enclosed herewith that correspondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. F'- In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in par

Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-015234 17 EFTA00189078 From: Sent: Thursd

is attached below. This letter will he faxed and mailed to you later today. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call me at Sincerely, Gail E. Ferguson Assistant Ethics Counsel (See attached file: 28386gef denialdoc) on 09/29/2008 12:05:05 PM To: "Ethics Opinions" <etoninionetlabar.orte cc: Sub