Epstein Secrets

l Protective Order (DE 305) is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 15ih day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 16 EFTA00606603

lorida, this 15ih day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 16 EFTA00606603

te 5 EFTA00606592 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 326 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2015 Page 6 of 16 and what degree of protection is required." Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984) (discussing Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)); see also F.T.C. v. AbbVie Prods. LW, 713 F.3d 54, 58 (11th Cir. 2013) (not

l Protective Order (DE 305) is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 15ih day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 16 EFTA00674431

lorida, this 15ih day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 16 EFTA00674431

te 5 EFTA00674420 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 326 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2015 Page 6 of 16 and what degree of protection is required." Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984) (discussing Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)); see also F.T.C. v. AbbVie Prods. LW, 713 F.3d 54, 58 (11th Cir. 2013) (not

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs,

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may re

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs,

could be damaging to reputation and privacy. The government clearly has a substantial interest in preventing this sort of abuse of its processes. Seattle Times Co. Rhinehard, 467 U.S. 20, 35 (1984). The Eleventh Circuit has "repeatedly acknowledged the private nature of discovery" and that "[a] court may rest

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs

out its contents." Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Case No. 3:13-cv-222-J-34JBT (M.D. Fla. March 13, 2014), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41406, at *6, quoting Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 31 (1984) Placing limitations on the dissemination and use of pretrial discovery is particularly important since "[t]he