Epstein Secrets

Jay Lefkowitz Response to email that Jenny from Judge Marra's office spoke with the Judge and he agreed to t

and Roy Black; cc: Gerald Lefcourt, John McMillan, Karen Atkinson, and Andrew Lourie . Jay Lefkowitz Response to email that Jenny from Judge Marra's office spoke with the Judge and he agreed to take the matter off the calendar. If a plea agreement is reached, USAO will withdraw the subpoena an

ceeding conducted by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) arising out of a decision by United States District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in the matter of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2I United States, S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra; (3) the materials are needed to avoid an injusti

rew Lourie, Criminal Chief Matt Menchel, First Assistant Jeff Sloman, and U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. AUSA Atkinson did participate in meetings with the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office about Epstein's work release and several conference calls with defendant attorney Roy Black and others about Epstein's breaches of the Non-Prosecut

: I write to confirm my conversation with Mr. Letkowitz of June 12, 2009. As I mentioned during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and

ing that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to an

tion for the work release program demonstrated that Mr. Epstein made several false statements in his application and made threatening statements to the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley

enses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 16 Podhurst Orseck, L.A. Government Exhibit B rnta MnN nt 14071A r MARRA 25 West Flagkr Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3053582300 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463 4346 www.podhuntcom EFTA00210874 C

istrict CI , idge from ' Magistnitc Jo:lament VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). aeatl (See lunation' patch. a) Re-filed Case 0 YES ja NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases OYES CI NO DOCKET See Attached NUMBER VII. CAUSE OF ACTION (tense U.S. ('nil Statute under which you ace filing and Write a Br

tjegel aelfc1/7 27 Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are

peal to District CI idge from ' Magistrate lodgment VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). (See atrouctions letabl a) Re-filed Case OYES 0 NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases GIYES O NO DCICKET See Attached NUMBER VII. CAUSE OF ACTION Cie the U.S. ( Mange under which you are filing and Write a Brief

abl a) Re-filed Case OYES 0 NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases GIYES O NO DCICKET See Attache

2009 Page 10 of 27 Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are

peal to District CI idge from ' Magistrate lodgment VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). (See atrouctions letabl a) Re-filed Case OYES 0 NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases GIYES O NO DCICKET See Attached NUMBER VII. CAUSE OF ACTION Cie the U.S. ( Mange under which you are filing and Write a Brief

abl a) Re-filed Case OYES 0 NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases GIYES O NO DCICKET See Attache

2009 Page 10 of 27 Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are

of the agents and myself the matter was, in fact, "currently under investigation." The NPA was signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10, 2008 and May 30, 2008. During the period that the letters were sent, Epstein was asserting that: (I

as signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10,

directing their communications to MAUSA9 , Criminal Chief First Assistant Jeff and U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. did participate in meetings with the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office about Epstein's work release and several conference calls with defendant attorney Roy Black and others about Epstein's breaches of the Non-Prosecut

: I write to confirm my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12, 2009. As I mentioned during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and

ing that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to an

tion for the work release program demonstrated that Mr. Epstein made several false statements in his application and made threatening statements to the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley

as signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10,

of the agents and myself the matter was, in fact, "currently under investigation." The NPA was signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10, 2008 and May 30, 2008. During the period that the letters were sent, Epstein was asserting that: (a

bit 76 at 2). On November 16, 2007, the case agents met with ASA Belohlavek who said that Epstein would be housed at the Palm Beach County Jail, so the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office would be in charge of whether Epstein would be eligible for work release (id. at I). Special Agent Richards confirmed on November 16, 2007 that Eps

: I write to confirm my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12, 2009. As I mentioned during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and

ing that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to an

tion for the work release program demonstrated that Mr. Epstein made several false statements in his application and made threatening statements to the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley

: I write to confirm my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12, 2009. As I mentioned during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and

ing that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to an

tion for the work release program demonstrated that Mr. Epstein made several false statements in his application and made threatening statements to the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office about legal repercussions if he was not admitted to the program. I also discovered—again, not from Mr. Epstein or his attorneys—that Judge McSorley