Epstein Secrets

m a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter ... on its own,"" the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) sua sponte struck all allegations against additional parties from the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore deni

s own,"" the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) sua sponte struck all allegations agains

ributes to public understanding of the rule of law" and "validates [its] claim of functioning as surrogates for the public."J9 48 Westmoreland v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for Norfolk Cly., 457 U.S. 596, 606, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 73

omitted). 6 EFTA00092313 defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter . . . on its own,"4 the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) .51112 sponte struck all allegations against additional parties from the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore deni

its own,"4 the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) .51112 sponte struck all allegations aga

ial system would be well served were our common law courts to revitalize this crucial qualification to the litigation privilege. " Westmoreland v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for Norfolk Cty., 457 U.S. 596, 606 (1982)). 49 Richmon

AM Doe v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson

:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth A. Marra. Calendar Call set for 1/22/2010 10:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth A. Marra., Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2008. Discovery due by 8/3/2009. Motions due by 8/31/2009. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johns

oose his Fifth Amendment rights, he will expose himself to an adverse inference at the summary-judgment stage and at trial. See generally. Wehlingl. Columbia Broad. Sys., 611 F.2d 1026, 1027 (5th Cir. 1980) (observing that "invocation of the privilege would be subject to the drawing of an adverse inference by

... " See In re. Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14), Deel. of AUSA Villa

ose his Fifth Amendment rights, he will expose himself to an adverse inference at the summary-judgment stage and at trial. See generally, Wehling v. Columbia Broad Sys., 611 F.2d 1026, 1027 (5th Cir. 1980) (observing that "invocation of the privilege would be subject to the drawing of an adverse inference by the

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. FILED by

ose his Fifth Amendment rights, he will expose himself to an adverse inference at the summary-judgment stage and at trial. See generally, Wehlingl. Columbia Broad. Sys, 611 F.2d 1026, 1027 (5th Cir. 1980) (observing that "invocation of the privilege would be subject to the drawing of an adverse inference by t