Epstein Secrets

NS Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1, Intervenor/Appellants hereby certify that the following persons have an interest in the outcome of this case: 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth 2. Acosta, R. Alexander 3. Black, Roy 4. Cassell, Paul G. 5. Edwards, Bradley J. 6. Epstein, Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo

. The prior civil discovery order relied upon by Judge Marra, DE188:3-4, resulted from the efforts of the civ

ied, 552 U.S. 1131 (2008) 6, 30, 33, 45 Baker v. Secretary, U.S. Dep't of Transportation, 452 Fed. Appx. 934 (11th Cir. 2012) 33 Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63 (1977) 31 Church of Scientology v. United States, 506 U.S. 9 (1992) 46 Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949

ending in federal court, aimed at vacating the federal plea agreement on the grounds that it violated victims' rights.i.137) On April 7, 2015, Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the allegations made by alleged vie: it against Prince Andrew had no bearing on the lawsuit by alleged victims seekinj to reopen : • st

open : • stem s non-prosecution plea agreement with the federal government; the judge ordered that allegation to be struck from the record.RM Judge Marra made no ruling as to whether claims by are true or false. Though he did not allow Jane Does 3 and 4 to join the suit, Marra specifically said that

rmation Manager' cAPOL-Por Intel 1. sApp •POC Police O,erations Centre; SAPOL:Southern District cAPOL:lyestem ()Istria- SAPOI :Yorke Mid North ISA( Allison. Scott (SAPOL-TS&T); 8aulderstone, Christine (SAPOL). Bruhn John (SAINT ); Cunningham, Colin (SAPOLI; Ploov. Russell (SAPOL), pL:SAPOI. RES; s a a

FREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-8

l justice system. Properly administered, they can benefit all concerned." Bordenkirchej v. Haves 434 U.S. 357, 361-62 (1978), quoting filackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 71 (1977). To encourage defendants to participate in the plea negotiation process, rules have developed to prohibit admission into ev