Epstein Secrets

Premises in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Florida Plaint v. Defendant Civil Action No. 08-CV-80119- Marra (If the action is pending in another district, state where: SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREM

ng to object to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought " Chaikin v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege r

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

ng to object to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought." Chaikin v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege r

refrain from weighing the evidence, determining the credibility of witnesses, or substituting [itsj own version of the facts for that of the jury." Marra v. Phila. Nous. Auth., 497 F.3d 286, 300 (3d Cir. 2007) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). A motion for judgment as a matter of law

simply failed to submit sufficient information for the Court to make a determination. Mr. Francis' submission only demonstrates the balance of his Fidelity IRA account when the parties dissolved their marriage in 2012. The Court has no reliable evidence from Dr. Wright-Francis regarding her retirement