Epstein Secrets

oe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON EFTA00317246 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do

argain are important components of this country's criminal justice system. Properly administered, they can benefit all concerned." Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 361-62 (1978), quoting Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 71 (1977). To encourage defendants to participate in the plea negotiation

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, v. U

nduct with minors. The Executive Branch enjoys exceedingly broad discretion in deciding how, or whether, to charge an individual. Bordenkircher v. Hayes , 434 U.S. 357, 668 (1978)("In our system, so long as the prosecutor has probable cause to believe that the accused committed an offense defined by

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

tes v. BP Products North America, Inc., 2008 WL 501321 at *11, citing United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996)(quoting Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 (1978)). Allowing claims like Petitioners' to proceed would open the inner workings of that prosecutorial discretion and the gra

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

ates v. BP Products North America, Inc 2008 WL 501321 at *11, citing United States v. Armstrong , 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996)( quoting Bordenkircher v. Hayes , 434 U.S. 357, 364 (1978)). Allowing claims like Petitioners' to proceed would open the inner workings of that prosecutorial discretion and the g

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UN

onduct with minors. The Executive Branch enjoys exceedingly broad discretion in deciding how, or whether, to charge an individual. Bordenkircher I Hayes , 434 U.S. 357, 668 (1978)("In our system, so long as the prosecutor has probable cause to believe that the accused committed an offense defined by

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

tes v. BP Products North America, Inc., 2008 WL 501321 at *11, citing United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996)(quoting Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 (1978)). Allowing claims like Petitioners' to proceed would open the inner workings of that prosecutorial discretion and the gra

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs UN

re decisions that generally rest in the prosecutor's discretion." United States v. Batchelder, 442 U.S. 114, 124 . . . (1979); see Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 . . . (1978). Fokker Services, 818 F.3d at 741. Accordingly, judicial authority is "at its most limited when reviewing the Execu

and, investigators say, underage girls By ANDREW MARRA, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer LNGED GARGOYLES gu

8. Hall said she'd been watching the kids, several of which arc hers, the en- tire day. She'd cooked them breakfast. made sure they ate again when Hayes .See TODDLER. 9B le OBITUARY Cantor Stephen Dubov, voice just one of his gifts By DIANNA SMITH Palau /ta i Past 94 Writer They sent out the an

ICATION: 0662136 001452017 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA DATE: 09-07-00 P-000101 EFTA00227481 imp-u's

ntil every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to find if a crime has been committed.' " Branrburg v. Hayes. 408 U.S. 665, 701, 92 S.Ct. 2646, 2667, 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972) (quoting United States v. Stone, 429 F.2d 138, 140 (2d Cir.1970)); In re Grand Jury

Epstein's non-prosecution agreement 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000770 EFTA00230594 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Do

States'. BP Products North America, Inc., 2008 WL 501321 at *11, citing United States'. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996Xquoting Bordenkircherl. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 (1978)). Allowing claims like Petitioners' to proceed would open the inner workings of that prosecutorial discretion and the gra