Epstein Secrets

the attached letter providing notice of a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement on attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. On Friday, June 12, 2009, Judge Marra will be presiding ova a hearing on Jeffrey Epstein's motions to stay all of the civil lawsuits filed against him by victims identified through our i

Apr-el lo ()Writ( Judge from Magistrate Judgment VI. RELATED/RE-FILED (50C IsSINMONIO • CASE(S). word perk a) Re-filed Case OYES 9) NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases OYES ONO DOCK MBETER See Attached NU VII. CAUSE OF ACTION CI e Ilse U.S. Civil Statute under Mikis you ere filing and Wnie a Br

s for Jeffrey Epstein. On Friday, June 12, 2009, Judge Marra will be presiding ova a hearing on Jeffrey Epstei

the unamended version of the law implicitly must have permitted victims to sue even after they turned 18. That interpretation not only would render Masha's Law superfluous; it would make Masha's Law's internally redundant, because Masha's Law retained the "legal disability" language from the 2003 vers

amendments were made by § 707 of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, Pub. L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587, 650 (2006), and are known as "Masha's Law." As Senator Kerry—the author of Masha's Law—explained: What Masha's law does, and what is incorporated in here, is it changes "any minor" to

RN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEI

a result of the recognition by Congress of the inadequacy of the $50,000.00 floor which previously existed. See Senator Kerry's remarks concerning Masha's Law at 152 Cong. Rec. S8012-02, 2006 WL 2034118 (Cong. Rec.). In fact, Senator Kerry's remarks lend support for the construction of the statute E

redicate acts under 18 U.S.C. §2255. PL 105-314, Title VI, §605, October 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984. In 2006, Congress adopted what was referred to as Masha's Law, which is part of the Adam Walsh's Child Protection Safety Act of 2006. (PL 109-248, Title VII(b)(c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 650). Pursuant

ions to Epstein's Motion to Compel and/or Identify. This Notice should only be filed in 08-80119, not in all of the Epstein cases.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/20/2009. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (1c3) (Entered: 05/20/2009) 05/22/2009 15 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruc

No. 102 v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Member case: (View

mendments (cited above) where Congress unambiguously expressed its intent regarding retroactive application, there is no expression with respect to Masha's Law, the 2006 amended version of §2255. An EFTA00175271 Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2009 Page 9 of 11 Ja

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA-JOHNSON Plaintiff; v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

amendments were made by § 707 of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, Pub. L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587, 650 (2006), and are known as "Masha's Law." As Senator Kerry—the author of Masha's Law—explained: What Masha's law does, and what is incorporated in here, is it changes "any minor" t

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTE

of the history and purpose behind 18 U.S.C. §2255 and the assertion that "Congress specifically intended for the law to apply retroactively to her (Masha) even though she had already been abused and had already filed suit under §2255," (Response, p. 14), is not even supported by the Congressional Reco

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTE

of the history and purpose behind 18 U.S.C. §2255 and the assertion that "Congress specifically intended for the law to apply retroactively to her (Masha) even though she had already been abused and had already filed suit under §2255," (Response, p. 14), is not even supported by the Congressional Reco

RN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE II, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EP

ein, et al. Page 6 not a procedural one. As discussed more fully in Defendant's motion to dismiss, the statutory scheme enacted and amended under "Masha's Law" is consitently referred to as criminal penalties and punishments directed at those who sexually exploit and abuse minors. Also, Plaintiff i