Epstein Secrets

on of others.” United States District Court Judge Marra February 21, 2016 Summary Judgement Order at 2, C

fication of others.” United States District Court Judge Marra February 21, 2016 Summary Judgement Order at 2, C

ands of dollars from British tabloids with a motive for selling papers and advertisements and without regard for truth, veracity or substantiation,” Menninger noted in a 2016 response filed in the case. In February, the Miami Herald filed a federal court motion in the Southern District of New York, seeking

, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald Page 14 of 17 Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 15 of 18 Maxwell’s lawyer, Laura Menninger, declined to comment, referring the Herald to the court history. wy! 4 g ry “{Roberts] fabricated a story of abuse at the hands of Ms. Maxwell in ex

foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister, and other world leaders." Menninger Decl. Ex. C at 4-5. On April 7, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Marra denied Plaintiff's Joinder Motion, ordered the portions of the Joinder Motion pertaining to non-parties Although the Complaint does not explicitly

. C at 4-5. On April 7, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Marra denied Plaintiff's Joinder Motion, ordered the p

PLAINTIFF, V. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, DEFENDANT. X 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT Laura A. Menninger, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver CO 80203 Tel: Dated: November 30, 2015 EFTA00595583 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS

tempted to join the action as "Jane Doe 3." While Judge Marra denied her motion to join, he specifically held

sell and Mr. Edwards represent not only Jane Doe I and 2 in that case, but also Ms. — who attempted to join the action as "Jane Doe 3." While Judge Marra denied her motion to join, he specifically held that Jane Doe 3 "can participate in this litigated effort to vindicate the rights of similarly situ

egoing document is being served this day on the individuals identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: (303) 831-7364 Fax: (303) 832-2

itles redacted consistent with Appellee's objections herein 5424 D Not a judicial document, not relied upon by Court; portions stricken by Judge Marra Florida Order I Not a judicial document, not relied upon by Court L Not a judicial document, not relied upon by Court; 3rd Party Confidentialit

, not relied upon by Court; portions stricken by Judge Marra Florida Order I Not a judicial document, not r

udge Marra /172 Proposed Redactions: Statement of Undisputed Facts 11- 17 and 35-52 10 EFTA00794224 Respectfully submitted, s/ Ty Gee Ty Gee Laura Menninger Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Tel 303.831.7364 [email protected]; [email protected];

ew salacious details about public figures." Even Judge Marra noted in his April 7 Order that Plaintiff's lates

ous lies" immediately follows the sentence: "Each time the story is retold it changes, with new salacious details about public figures." Even Judge Marra noted in his April 7 Order that Plaintiff's latest story involves Plaintiff's reference to Brach v. Congregation Yetev Lev D'Saimar, Inc., 696 N.Y.S

Dismiss. 10 EFTA00591588 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 25 Filed 12/28/15 Page 13 of 13 Dated: December 28. 2015. Respectfully submitted, s/ Laura A. Menninger Laura A. Menninger (LM-1374) HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Fax: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell CER

ould have "shed tremendous public light on Epstein and other powerful individuals." Id. at 6-7. As and her lawyers expected, before District Judge Marra in the CVRA action could strike the "lurid details" of allegations in the joinder motion, members of the media obtained copies of the motion, prin

7. As and her lawyers expected, before District Judge Marra in the CVRA action could strike the "lurid detai

e Court dismiss Counts Five and Six. Dated: March 15, 2021 10 EFTA00097391 Respectfully submitted, s/ Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine

07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. poe nen nee nee eee eee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011463 --- PAGE

ible (Motion in Limine 18) oo. eeeesseesseceseesseesseceseesseesseceseesseeeseeeseeessesseessaeeseecseeesaeesaecsseesseeseeeeeeseessees 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19)... eee 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with R

eeseecseeesaeesaecsseesseeseeeeeeseessees 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Li

F NEW YORK pane eee ene een enenenee X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, : Plaintiff, V. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, : Defendant. . ee X Declaration of Laura A. Menninger in Support of Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment I, Laura A. Menninger, declare as follows: 1. Iam an attorney at law duly licensed in the Sta

r Rule 21, Doe v. United States, No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2016). 7. Attached as

Florida, this 6" day of April, 2015. ea fo “in KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 GIUFFRE002853

tiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. wen ee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014788 --- PAGE

and admissible (Motion in Limine 18) ooo... cecccecccccccccesscececsseececsseeeceseescesseesssueescnsssescesseessesssesensseeesssaeeess 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19).................00. 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s convers

sueescnsssescesseessesssesensseeesssaeeess 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Li

F NEW YORK pane eee ene een enenenee X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, : Plaintiff, V. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, : Defendant. . ee X Declaration of Laura A. Menninger in Support of Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine I, Laura A. Menninger, declare as follows: 1. Iam an attorney at law d

r Rule 21, Doe v. United States, No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2016). I declare under

16, 39, and 49. " DE 293, in its entirety. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 6" day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014856