Epstein Secrets

l calls for investigation, on February 21, 2019, Judge Marra issued an order granting partial summary judgmen

y them of court proceedings. After many years of litigation, news articles, and Congressional calls for investigation, on February 21, 2019, Judge Marra issued an order granting partial summary judgment in favor of petitioners (DE 435). In his Order, Judge Matra referenced a letter sent by the FBI's

ensure compliance with the agreement. OPR is also investigating allegations stemming from the February 21, 2019 order issued by U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra, in Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 v. United States, 9:08-80736-CIV- MARRA (S.D. Fla.), in which Judge Marra concluded that the USAO violated the Crime V

the materials were never returned to the grand jury (because they were the subject of a never-decided motion to quash). See, e.g., United States v. Phillips, 843 F.2d 438, 441 (11'" Cir. 1988) ("The term `matters occurring before the grand jury' has been defined to include anything that will reveal what

ensure compliance with the agreement. OPR is also investigating allegations stemming from the February 21, 2019 order issued by U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra, in Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 I. United States, 9:08-80736-CIV- MARRA (S.D. Fla.), in which Judge Marra concluded that the USAO violated the Crime V

, 2019, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra issued an order granting partial summary judgment in favor of petitioners (DE 435). In his Order, Judge Marra referenced a letter sent by the FBI's victim-witness specialist to Jane Does 1 and 2 on January 10, 2008 that 1 Early subpoenas were issued on beha

t in favor of petitioners (DE 435). In his Order, Judge Marra referenced a letter sent by the FBI's victim-wit

at the Chart contained any 6(e) information. 5 The Exhibits included 6(e) materials, including grand jury transcripts. 6 See, e.g., United States.. Phillips, 843 F.2d 438, 441 (11th Cir. 1988) ("The term `matters occurring before the grand jury' has been defined to include anything that will reveal what

DONE AND ORDERED this Augu~t fs;· 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA RJOON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

S MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein'

gation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). The burden is on the party seeking the protective order to demonstrate good cause for its issuance. See Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 1

ORDERED this Au9uat 15, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. Winn LINNEA R. JO ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

gation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). The burden is on the party seeking the protective order to demonstrate good cause for its issuance. See Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp. 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19

NE AND ORDERED this Au9uat 15, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JO ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

gation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). The burden is on the party seeking the protective order to demonstrate good cause for its issuance. See Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp. 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re /went Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19

ng lawsuit is pending in federal court, aimed at vaathelederal-plea_ag on the grounds that it violated victims' rights.(ia7) On April 7, 2015, Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the allegations made by alleged victim aigainst Prince Andrew had no bearing on the lawsuit by alleged victims seekinj to reopen Epstei

the record.D34We Marra made no ruling as to whether claims by Roberts are true or false. Though he did not allow Jane Does 3 and 4 to join the suit, Marra specifically said that Roberts may later give evidence when the case comes to court:fi38) On February 21, 2019, in the case of Two Jane Does v. Uni

996 Premier of SA - State Politian of South Australia apsujig Kadina SA 1945 - Three years following the birth of the targeted victims mother, 'Ma Phillips (maiden name), born in Kadina in 1942 - Similar in age Both parties known to one another and both parties born in the same location of Kadina. John

rental car. victim. A motion may be filed before Judge Marra on the issue of inappropriate contact with and h

island. knew of other gifts given to , including Secret lingerie, birthday flowers, and a rental car. victim. A motion may be filed before Judge Marra on the issue of inappropriate contact with and harassment of M. 3 EFTA00191647 The one recruit whom I have kept in the indictment is Z. She is

dant would pose a danger to the community that would not exist were [the de ndant) detained? Rodriguez, 897 F. Supp. at 1463 citing United States I Phillips, 732 F. Supp. 255, 267 (D. i Mass. 990), &rig denied, 952 F.2d 591 (1st Cir. 1992); see also United States Smith, 79 F.3d 1208, 1209 (D.C.Cir.1996

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs,

ted as work product is governed by federal law even if the case is in court solely on grounds of diversity of citizenship.") J. FN6. Musselman I Phillips, 176 F.R.D. 194, 195 n. 1 (D.Md.1997) (collecting luthority); Nutramax Labs., Inc. . Twin Laboratories Inc., 183 F. .D. 458, 463, n. 8 (D.Md.