Epstein Secrets

ever, the Court should be aware that DEs 165-3, 185-2 and 185-15 are pleadings that were stricken pursuant to Rule 12(0 by U.S. District Court Judge Marra and thus are not, as Plaintiff claims, "publicly available on the docket of Doe v. United States, 08-cv- 80736 (S.D.Fla.)." Resp. at 15 n.5. These t

, 39, and 49. DE 293, in its entirety. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 611' day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 EFTA00075003

cken pursuant to Rule 12(0 by U.S. District Court Judge Marra and thus are not, as Plaintiff claims, "publicly

For the reasons recently briefed to the Court concerning Professor Dershowitz's identical argument, the position is without merit. See DE 892 (Judge Sweet's May 2017 Order); DE 1059 (law of the case that parties and deponents reasonably relied on protective order); DE 1062 at 3-6 (protective order tra

m a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter ... on its own,"" the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) sua sponte struck all allegations against additional parties from the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore deni

s own,"" the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) sua sponte struck all allegations agains

a settlement agreement, and the case was closed the next day. C. Motions to Intervene and Unseal Over the course of the litigation before Judge Sweet, three outside parties attempted to unseal some or all of the sealed material. On August 11, 2016, Dershowitz moved to intervene, seeking to unsea

omitted). 6 EFTA00092313 defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter . . . on its own,"4 the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) .51112 sponte struck all allegations against additional parties from the pleadings, including those against Dershowitz, and therefore deni

its own,"4 the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Judge) .51112 sponte struck all allegations aga

ed a settlement agreement, and the case was closed the next day. C. Motions to Intervene and Unseal Over the course of the litigation before Judge Sweet, three outside parties attempted to unseal some or all of the sealed material. On August 11, 2016 Dershowitz moved to intervene, seeking to unseal

ould have "shed tremendous public light on Epstein and other powerful individuals." Id. at 6-7. As and her lawyers expected, before District Judge Marra in the CVRA action could strike the "lurid details" of allegations in the joinder motion, members of the media obtained copies of the motion, prin

7. As and her lawyers expected, before District Judge Marra in the CVRA action could strike the "lurid detai

eview of the docket, unfortunately, reflects over one-thousand entries. The parties disagreed about the scope and meaning of virtually all of Judge Sweet's discovery orders, including those related to Ms. Maxwell's depositions. Significantly, Judge Sweet's Order prefaced all the listed categories with

tices. etc.?? G —catt.:0 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-001230 EFTA00228610 MAY - 1b -10J I J LIU

as PEN Pedant araPana 2 days (S 10 .00 eharlie) Charge: O Cerelearder O Plaitedial Snadnatiea Seta PIN se attenuate wan. seta,. ramin. Sweet .Addresa City. State. ZIP lialane• / Payment oo..roe. Pranenir balsam* at S Prom a 00000 s ai to Te Transfer payment of • Prom suroo