Epstein Secrets

Jay Lefkowitz Response to email that Jenny from Judge Marra's office spoke with the Judge and he agreed to t

ia and Roy Black; cc: Gerald Lefcourt' John McMillan, Karen Atkinson, and Andrew Lourie Jay Lefkowitz Response to email that Jenny from Judge Marra's office spoke with the Judge and he agreed to take the matter off the calendar. If a plea agreement is reached, LISA() will withdraw the subpoena

Andrew Lourie Marie Villafana Email regarding proposed changes to indictment 36/64 / /6 /007 Meeting where Criminal Chief Menchel announces that USA Acosta will offer a two-year state plea. Present: Matt Menchel, Marie Villafana, Andy Lourie (phone), Valerie Parlave, Junior Ortiz, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall,

I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of

ss." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(Me will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardin

ageiee ted Feb 1a ge 2 date. 1353 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014715 EFTA00225177 U.S. Department of Just

A00225184 Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "[wie will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regard

draft letter to DAG EXHIBIT B-I27 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00225328 U.S. Department of

ss." Mr. Starr also objected to the SOFLis intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: Il(w)e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regard

nior, Robert (USAFLS) please review 08-80736-CV-MARRA se EXHIBIT B-128 P-014955 EFTA00225342 U.S.

no less." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DRAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(w)e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardi

stributed outside your *racy CAN No 011-110716CV.MARRA P.012645 EFTA00225707 FD•302a (Rev 10.6-931

the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the federal resolution as required by law; however, "rwle will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding w

gotiations? Tracking: 268 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013329 EFTA00230234 LIM° 7 1Xiskat,olh /2)

the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the federal resolution as required by law; however, "[wje will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding w