Epstein Secrets

ears' old. On March 11, 2004, called at 9:13 p.m. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 p.m. On March 12,

to the girls whom she recruited. Slieksaid that she told Epstein that she was 1 at "he knew better." a also said that she was never instructed by Mt Epstein or to make sure that the girls that she brought were over 18 and was never asked to provide identification/proof of her age for herself or for any

bject Re: Operation Leap Year Date May 1, 2007 (Revised 9/13/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08)' To From R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region , Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval f

22)5 portions of the Agreement. As I previously observed, our intent has been to place the victims in the same position as they would have been had Mt Epstein been convicted at trial No more: no less. From our meeting, it appears that the deeense agrees that this was the intent During the course of negoti

ed victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 1771

research contacts available. The employee was put in contact with a former colleague who was then conducting eye research at Washington University. Mt Epstein organized several meetings to determine how the colleague could be of assistance, including by arranging for further meetings with experts at Washin

kOuNsw.com RENATO C. STABILE stablefcaurlaw.com FAITH A. FRIEDMAN flriolmsnalccostlawcom BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4'h

iff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the panics to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mt. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." Second, I would like to address the issue of victim's rights pursuant to Section 1771 I understand tha

oposed victim nothica letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Slonnut already iticorpoiated an the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section ;7

mprisonment to the state court judge who sentences him. Mr. Epstein will serve that sentence of imprisonment at the .Palm Beach County Jail. Third, Mt Epstein has agreed that he will compensate you for damages you have suffered, under the following circumstances. That portion of the agreement that relates

d victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided tide draft letter to defense as a courtesy. in addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Simian already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. !agree that Section 3771

research contacts available. The employee was put in contact with a former colleague who was then conducting eye research at Washington University. Mt Epstein organized several meetings to determine how the colleague could be of assistance, including by arranging for further meetings with experts at Washin

STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT SHERYL C. REICH RENATO C. STABILE FAITH A. FRIEDMAN BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Esq., Chief, Criminal Division tates Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4u' Street Miami, Florida 33132

irst document attached hereto is the June 30, 2008 proposed Notification, which was hand-delivered to Jack Goldberger and Michael Tein shortly after Mt. Epstein entered hi s guilty plea. Following that, I have attached the July 9, 2008 response from Mr. Goldberger. I have highlighted two portions. The first

ed victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771

irst document attached hereto is the June 30, 2008 proposed Notification, which was hand-delivered to Jack Goldberger and Michael Tein shortly after Mt. Epstein entered hi s guilty plea. Following that, I have attached the July 9, 2008 response from Mr. Goldberger. I have highlighted two portions. The first

ed victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771