Epstein Secrets

ct (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771 1, 5 Grand Jury Proceedings, 142 F.3d 1416, 1419 (11th Cir. 1998) 15 In re Federal Grand Jury Proceedings (FGJ 91-9), Cohen, 975 F.2d 1488 (11th Cir. 1992) 16 In re Grand Jury Proceedings in the Matter of Fine, 641 F.2c1 I99 (11th Cir. 1981) 16 In re Grand Jury Procee

Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo A. 8. Howell, Jay 9. IMPIIPIS 10. Lefkowitz, Jay 11. Perczek, Jackie 12. libuilm.1 13. ra.c....1.„ , ‘,1„ 1. 14. Sloman, Jeffrey 15. 101010MRNI,PIIIIMP 16. Weinberg, Martin C-1 of 2 EFTA00209568 17. Doe No. 1, Jane 18. Doe No. 2, Jane Note: As they have in the

010.docx pay Forwarded messa e From: Carolyn Cohen Date: Thu, Feb IS, 2010 at 6:08 PM Subject: JE

. Since that time, I have devoted the following hours: Jan. 26 meeting Jan. 27 .25 hour: Conversation with Marty Weinberg, discussion regarding Sloman .25 hour: Scheduling Sloman meeting, discussions Jan. 28 .25 hour: conversation with Feb. 1 .50 hour: Feb. 2 .50 hour: Sloman Feb. 3 5.25

18, 2010 pay Forwarded messa e From: Carolyn Cohen Date: Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM Subject: JE

ours: Jan. 26 .25 hour: meeting Jan. 27 .25 hour: Jan. 28 .25 hour: conversation with Conversation with Marty Weinberg, discussion regarding Sloman Scheduling Sloman meeting, discussions Conversation with Jeffrey Epstein regarding Josephsberg, Marty Weinberg Feb. 1 .50 hour: Conversation wi

18, 2010 pay Forwarded message From: Carolyn Cohen Date: Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM Subject: JE

. Since that time, I have devoted the following hours: Jan. 26 meeting Jan. 27 .25 hour: Conversation with Marty Weinberg, discussion regarding Sloman .25 hour: Scheduling Sloman meeting, discussions Jan. 28 .25 hour: conversation with Feb. 1 .50 hour: Feb. 2 .50 hour: Sloman Conversation

er BRADLEY J. EXWARDS ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ CAROLYN COHEN ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 IND

gainst me during the negotiations. Q. Is this part of your work product that you're waiving right now? MR. SWEDER: No, no. A. My conversation with Jeffrey Sloman is not work product. MR. SCOTT: Here's a -- BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. What is the work product -- MR. SCOTT: Excuse me. Please review wo MwA HM B@ WHY

Mark E. Pena, Michael A. Gold, Todd Alan Foster, Cohen, Jayson & Foster, Tampa, FL, G. Mark Thompson, M

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Vi°Mena. Ann Mane C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday. July 31, 2007 1:37 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Menchel, Matthew (USAFLS); Lourie. Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Emailing: Conf Plea Negotiations.wpd Attachments: Conf Plea Negotiati

the defense claim that this case "was, at heart, a local sex abuse case." Epstein Remedies Br. at 15 (quoting former First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman). Indeed, one of the experts that Intervenor Epstein hired represented to the Justice Department during discussions about the NPA that "[t]his is a

or enforcement of congressionally created rights, the courts must give "appropriate judicial deference toward the will of Congress ...."Hardison v. Cohen, 375 F.3d 1262, 1264 (11th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation omitted). Congress is "in a better position to decide whether or not the public interest w

the defense claim that this case "was, at heart, a local sex abuse case." Epstein Remedies Br. at 15 (quoting former First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman). Indeed, one of the experts that Intervenor Epstein hired represented to the Justice Department during discussions about the NPA that "[t]his is a

or enforcement of congressionally created rights, the courts must give "appropriate judicial deference toward the will of Congress ...."Hardison v. Cohen, 375 F.3d 1262, 1264 (11th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation omitted). Congress is "in a better position to decide whether or not the public interest w