Epstein Secrets

his and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit "." Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluct

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fe

itigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that

is and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit "BB." Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluct

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fe

itigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that

is and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit "BB." Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Greaser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluct

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fe

itigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that

sted by Epstein and Maxwell together. In light of this and other information, Edwards served her for deposition in 2009. Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluct

ket 11/11/2010 Page 4 of 16 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 4. Marsigliano was provided with the add

s named below, at the time, on the date, at the hour of the place indicated: NAME DATE AND TIME PLACE OF TAKING DEPOSITON Ghislaine Maxwell Go Brett Jaffe Cohen & Gresser, LLP 100 Park Avenue 23"1 Floor New York, NY 10017 July 1, 2010 @ 9:30AM Cohen & Gresser, LLP 100 Park Avenue 2341 Floor Ne

T OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.

s named below, at the time, on the date, at the hour of the place indicated: NAME DATE AND TIME PLACE OF TAKING DEPOSITON Ghislaine Maxwell Go Brett Jaffe Cohen & Gresser, LLP 100 Park Avenue 2r Floor New York, NY 10017 July 1, 2010 @ 9:30AM Cohen & Gresser, LLP 100 Park Avenue 23(d Floor New

T OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.

s named below, at the time, on the date, at the hour of the place indicated: NAME DATE AND TIME PLACE OF TAKING DEPOSITON Ghislaine Maxwell do Brett Jaffe Cohen & Gresser, LLP 100 Park Avenue 23'd Floor New York, NY 10017 May 13, 2010 @ 9:30AM Cohen & Gresser, LLP 100 Park Avenue 23'd Floor New

T OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.

named below, at the time, on the date, at the hour of the place indicated: NAME DATE AND TIME PLACE OF TAKING DEPOSITON Ghislaine Maxwell c/o Brett Jaffe Cohen & Gresser, LLP 100 Park Avenue 2r Floor New York, NY 10017 July 1, 2010 @ 9:30AM Cohen & Gresser, LLP 100 Park Avenue 23al Floor New

T OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.

this and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit “BB.” Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was relucta

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal entirpitge that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing ever clients intended to pursue an appeal of that dismi

at there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe’s case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein sinisly chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

this and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit “BB.” Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was relucta

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that d

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed