Epstein Secrets

57 established in the NPA after learning that another attorney established through the NPA would be making unsolicited contacts to the victims. Mr. Herman explained that the notification letters were "misleading" because they referred generally to a waiver of "any other claim for damages" without info

bout October 26 or 27, 2007, after the initial plea agreement was signed, FBI agents contacted Jane Doe I. Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards met in 78 US_Atty_Cor. 00220-00226 (Exhibit 78). 79 000551.000554 (Exhibit 79). 8° Exhibit 64 at 4. 81 Exhibit 62. 82 Id. 83 Id.; Exhibit 63 at

er civil suits that were filed against Epstein (before any lawsuit filed by Edwards). See Complaint, Jane Doe #4 v. Epstein (Exhibit "W") (filed by Herman and Mermelstein, PA). 48. At about the same time as Edwards filed his three lawsuits against Epstein, other civil attorneys were filing similar law

tein's witness tampering as follows: "UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER" On August 21, 2007, FBI cia.gents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards traveled to the home of to serve her with a federal grand 'u subpoena with an investigation pending in the Southern District of Florida. Ms.= wo

established in the NPA after learning that another attorney, established through the NPA, would be making unsolicited contacts to the victims. Mr. Herman explained that the notification letters were "misleading" because they referred generally to a waiver of "any other claim for damages," without inf

02/21/2019 Page 12 of 33 NPA's compensation procedure. (DE 407 at ¶ 65.) On about October 26 or 27, 2007, Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards met in person with Jane Doe 1. They explained that Epstein would plead guilty to state charges, he would be required to register as a sex offender

57 established in the NPA after learning that another attorney established through the NPA would be making unsolicited contacts to the victims. Mr. Herman explained that the notification letters were "misleading" because they referred generally to a waiver of "any other claim for damages" without info

bout October 26 or 27, 2007, after the initial plea agreement was signed, FBI agents contacted Jane Doe I. Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards met in 78 US_Atty_Cor. 00220-00226 (Exhibit 78). 79 000551.000554 (Exhibit 79). 8° Exhibit 64 at 4. 81 Exhibit 62. 82 Id. 83 Id.; Exhibit 63 at

er civil suits that were filed against Epstein (before any lawsuit filed by Edwards). See Complaint, Jane Doe #4 v. Epstein (Exhibit "W") (filed by Herman and Mermelstein, PA). 48. At about the same time as Edwards filed his three lawsuits against Epstein, other civil attorneys were filing similar law

's witness tampering as follows: "UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER" On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards traveled to the home of Leslie Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena with an investigation pending in the Southern.District of Flor

Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 12 of 33 NPA's compensation procedure. (DE 407 at ¶ 65.) On about October 26 or 27, 2007, Special Agent and Jason Richards met in person with Jane Doe 1. They explained that Epstein would plead guilty to state charges, he would be required to register as a sex offender

established in the NPA after learning that another attorney, established through the NPA, would be making unsolicited contacts to the victims. Mr. Herman explained that the notification letters were "misleading" because they referred generally to a waiver of "any other claim for damages," without inf