Epstein Secrets

ortant and must be fully vetted irrespective of timeliness concerns." See Exhibit 6, December 19, 2007 Letter from U.S. Attorney Acosta to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez at 3. He also stated that he had spoken with AAG Fisher to ask that she review this matter and to expedite the process. Id. • In the beginning of

. Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington, D.C. EFTA00194706 KIIUCLAND & ELLIS LLP CC: Jeffrey Sloman, Esq. Karen Atkinson, Esq. EFTA00194707 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DIS

solve all outstanding issues at the intersection of the NPA and 2255. Please advise if any remain. Sincerely, P. Lefkowitz Enclosure cc: \Laren Atkinson, Esq. EFTA00194716 J. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA.' GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA. ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. P.A.' BERNARD LIMEDEKER MARK T. LurnER, PA. JEFFRE

secution Agreement ("Part I"); (2) an October 2007 Addendum ("Part 2"); and (3)a letter dated December 19, 2007, from the U.S. Attorney to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, counsel to Jeffrey Epstein ("Part 3"). EFTA00234649 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 2 of 4 4. On J

rger From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 11:31 AM To: Jack Goldberger Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); [email protected] Subject: Re: Notice of Non-Compliance Dear Jack: I have conferred with a state court practitioner who stated

ny future violations. Sincerely, Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney By: A. Marie Villafafia Assistant United States Attorney cc: Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Division EFTA00234574 Exhibit 2 EFTA00234575 IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IT APPEARIN

otification would not be required by 18 USC §3771. Your office has come to a similar conclusion, see AUSA Alex Acosta's December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Sanchez, pg 2. We are sensitive, however, to the adversarial litigation previously filed regarding other §3771 issues. Accordingly, we propose the followin

42 AM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: New proposed response to Jay Dear Jay: (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen Thank you for your response. Our communications with Roy Black and later with you were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered to be

firmed, was examined and stated as follows: THE WITNESS: Yes, ma'am. BY MR. GOLDBERGER: 0. Jennifer, my name is Jack Goldberger and I'm here with Lilly Sanchez. And we are two lawyers that MEER lcci pans represent Jeffrey Epstein in some matters that are being investigated here in Palm Beach County. We'v

me to advise you that all communications and inquiries related to the Epstein matter, will be handled by AUSA Marie Villafana and/or her supervisor, Karen Atkinson, so he does not intend to respond to your e-mail or calls unless AUSA Villafana and/or her supetvisors advise him otherwise. Furthermore, you make re

sed are important and must be fully vetted irrespective of timeliness concerns." See December 19, 2007 Letter from U.S. Attorney Acosta to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez at pg 3. He also stated that he had spoken with AAG Fisher to ask that she review this matter and to expedite the process. Id. • In the beginning

usly dismissed-reviewed this very matter with you and other individuals in your office in November 2008. At that time, Mr. Roy Black met with you, Karen Atkinson, Bob Senior, and Jeffrey Sloman in Miami to review the work release issue. Among other significant documents, we presented you with your EFTA007311

ortant and must be fully vetted irrespective of timeliness concerns." See Exhibit 6, December 19, 2007 Letter from U.S. Attorney Acosta to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez at 3. He also stated that he had spoken with AAG Fisher to ask that she review this matter and to expedite the process. Id. • In the beginning of

have previously reviewed this very matter with you and other individuals in your Office in November 2008. At that time, Mr. Roy Black met with you, Karen Atkinson, Bob Senior, and Jeffrey Sloman in Miami to review the work release issue. Among other significant documents shown to you, we presented you with yo

Andrew Lourie, overruled us. b. AUSA McMillan and I did not want to have a subsequent meeting with another set of attorneys for Epstein, including Lilly Ann Sanchez, Gerald Lefcourt, Alan Dershowitz, and Roy Black, that would also include Criminal Chief Matt Menchel. Over my objections, Mr. Menchel also instruc

neys insisted that Criminal Chief Senior and that CEOS conduct similarly sterile reviews free from the "taint" of me and the federal agents. If Ms. Atkinson and I or the agents and I reached out to the SAO to discuss how the NPA should be worded to insure that we were getting correct information from Eps