Epstein Secrets

ea agreement was signed, Jane Doe #1 was contacted to be advised regarding the resolution of the investigation. On October 26, 2007, Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards met in person with Jane Doe #1. The Special Agents explained that Epstein would plead guilty to state charges, he would be requir

ent-Md-the-Justiee-Departmem-eenteet-any—tietimsr for-example-Jane-Dee-04r abeut-their-views-en-the-nen-pmseeutien, 26. On about December 6, 2007, Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney sent a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit noting-the-U,SrAttemeyls Office's leg

ion would continue, possibly leading to a federal prosecution. Edwards Declaration at & 8. 23. On about November 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeff Sloman sent an e-mail to Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Epstein, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit The e mail stated: that the U.S. Attor

vernment-reashed-any-fiaal resolatien-ef-that-investigatien,Eilwar-els-Deelaratien-at—&40, 33. On about February 25, 2008, Assistant U.S. Attorney Sloman sent an e-mail to Jay Lefkowitz, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit _.Epsteinis-spiminal-utiefease ceanseir explaining-that-the-lustie

ividual #28 (return date 5/1/07) 4/20/2007 Subpoena to Adult Video Warehouse (return date 5/1/07) 4/24/2007 Grand Jury Testimony of Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 21 4/24/2007 Grand Jury Testimony of Individual #37 22 4/24/2007 Subpoena to New York Strategy Group, LLC Custodian of Records (return date 5/

ena to Good Samaritan Hospital (return date 9/22/06) 9/21/2006 Subpoena to The Dalton School (return date 9/29/09) 9/26/2006 Acosta, Mulvihill, Sloman, Nom, Waters , Lowrie ' Stefin, Atkinson, Garcia, Brown, Boscovich, Martinez Villafana Memo regarding changes to Child Exploration Statutes in

bpoena to Paul A. Lavery (return date 5/29/07) 59 5/22/2007 Andrew Lourie Gerald B. Lefcourt Letter requesting to meet with Matthew Menchel and Jeffrey Sloman and Alex Acosta prior to an indictment being filed 28 5/22/2007 Matthew Menchel and Jeff Sloman; cc: A. Marie Villafaiia . Andrew Loune Emai

ileged Confidential Page 30 of 51 Contains 6(e) Material EFTA00224972 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 2/26/2008 Sloman, Senior Villafana Email response with concerns regarding allowing Epstein to keep the same as before 115 2/27/2008 Lefkowitz Sloman Email - 2

ea agreement was signed, Jane Doe #1 was contacted to be advised regarding the resolution of the investigation. On October 26, 2007, Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards met in person with Jane Doe #1. The Special Agents explained that Epstein would plead guilty to state charges, he would be requir

-Justiee-Deparnnent-emitast-any-vistimsr including fer-example-Jane-Dee44-r abeut-their-views-en4he-nen-preseeutiem 26. On about December 6, 2007, Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney sent a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit neting-the ttemeyie EpsteM-Ple-lette

ation would continue, possibly leading to a federal prosecution. Edwards Declaration at ¶ 8. a On about November 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeff Sloman sent an e-mail to Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Epstein, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit The e-mail-statedt—that-the-1478,Atiem

overnment reached any final mseimien-ef-that-investigatienr Edwards-Deelaratien-at--11-147 33. On about February 25, 2008, Assistant U.S. Attorney Sloman sent an e-mail to Jay Leflcowitz„ a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit _.Bpsteinls—eriminal—defense eeunselr explaining that the Justice D

ms and my credibility by asserting that I had told victims they could receive money for implicating Epstein."); (DE 403-18, ¶21) (FBI Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall: "I was concerned that if the victims were informed of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, which included an option for victims to seek monetary damages

ney Alex Acosta and his team into giving Epstein a sweetheart deal" has been soundly debunked; 11 EFTA00299031 there is no such evidence — NONE. Sloman, Alex Acosta Acted with Professionalism, Miami Herald Op-Ed, supra. The NPA was and is a valid and binding agreement. It contains no illegal provis

estigation was led by honorable federal prosecutors with outstanding reputations, including but not limited to: R. Alexander Acosta (U.S. Attorney), Jeffrey Sloman (First Assistant U.S. Attorney), Matthew Menchel (Chief, Criminal Division), Andrew Lourie (Deputy Chief, Northern Region), and AUSA Anna Marie Vil

availing themselves of this opportunity to conduct "limited" discovery, petitioners want more, in the form of depositions of (I) FBI Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall; (2) FBI S/A Jason Richards; (3) Jeffrey Sloman, who formerly served as both United States Attorney and First Assistant U.S. Attorney; (4) Matt Menc

mited" discovery, petitioners want more, in the form of depositions of (I) FBI Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall; (2) FBI S/A Jason Richards; (3) Jeffrey Sloman, who formerly served as both United States Attorney and First Assistant U.S. Attorney; (4) Matt Menchel, who formerly served as Chief of the Crimin

stion every factor considered by Mr. Acosta in deciding that a non- prosecution agreement was the appropriate course to take. Similarly, neither Mr. Sloman, the former First Assistant U.S. Attorney and former Acting U.S. Attorney, nor Mr. Menchel, the former Chief of the Criminal Division, were involve

investigation. I would appreciate if you would forward the documents and information Listed below to my attention or, if you prefer, to Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 500 South Flagler Drive, Suite 500, West Palm Beach, FL 33404. If yourequire a grand jury subpoena for any of the i

osta United States Attorney By: s/A. Marie Villafaria A. Marie Villafafia Assistant United States Attorney cc: — R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney You also accuse me of “broaden[ing] the scope of the investigation without any foundation for doing so by adding char

your client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein’s other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convinc

26452 22 1 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 2 3 4 I certify pages 2 through 21 are a true 5 transcript of my shorthand notes of the testimony of 6 E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall before the Federal Grand Jury, 7 west Palm Beach, Florida on the 6th day of February, 8 2007. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

TA00226423 Memorandum Subject Changes to Child Exploitation Statutes in Title 18 September 26, 2006 To R. Alexander Acosta Thomas Mulvihill Jeffrey Sloman Kenneth Now Robert Waters Andrew Lourie Roger Stefin Karen Atkinson Rolando Garcia Bruce Brown Richard Boscovich Barbara Martinez From cc: