Epstein Secrets

ant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed this2b, j day of December, 2008. A.A. Marie Villafafia, q. -4- EFTA00234652 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 35-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHER

Friday, June 27, 2008 10:00 AM To: Jack Goldberger Subject Have a great weekend! EFTA00234612 Exhibit 11 EFTA00234613 Jack Goldberger From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 11:31 AM To: Jack Goldberger Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFL

not hesitate to contact me or Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall at (561) 822-5946. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: A. Marie Villafala Assistant United States Attorney cc: Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, F.B.I. Ms. Clearetha Wright, Victim-Witness Coordinator, U.S. Attorney's

here was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12th regarding our fifth written Notice of Breach, and during the proceeding before Judge Marra, I heard again that Mr. Epstein had no intent to breach the Non-Prosecution Agreement but was merely r

y/New YorkfiGrkland-Ellis@K&E cc bcc Subject Fw: Jeffrey Epstein — Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New York/Krkland-Ellis on 09/22/2009 12:01 PM -- Nillafana, Ann Marie C. r aill To "Ja L lkowl "< doj.goy> cc "Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)" >. 06/15/2009 05:15 PM Subject Jeffrey Epstein Gentlemen: Pleas

l pursue in connection with this most recent breach and any future violations. Sincerely, G By: Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney A. Marie Villafafia Assistant United States Attorney cc: Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Division EFTA00601532

ere was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Le fkowitz of June 12th regarding our fifth written Notice of Breach, and during the proceeding before Judge Marra, I heard again that Mr. Epstein had no intent to breach the Non-Prosecution Agreement but was merely r

epresentative will be simultaneously representing parties that may be in conflict, in violation of Rule 1.7. For these reasons, we believe that Ms. Villafana's interpretation of the Agreement in connection with the attorney representative's role in the settlement process must be rejected. Second Issue: W

refer to the plea and sentencing as though it will be in January; Mr. Krisher's office has not confirmed any date; and Mr. Goldberger recently told Marie Villafafia that "there is no date." I must reiterate that a delayed guilty plea and sentencing — now more than two months beyond the original deadline — is un

here was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12th regarding our fifth written Notice of Breach, and during the proceeding before Judge Marra, I heard again that Mr. Epstein had no intent to breach the Non-Prosecution Agreement but was merely r