Epstein Secrets

igation. The case was then assigned to AUSA Anne Marie Villafana, who was supervised by AUSA Andy Lourie and then

turns, caused the FBI to interview Mr. Epstein's personal physician and subpoenaed Mr. Epstein's medical records. See November 16, 2006 Letter from M. Villafana. In June 2007, again without the requisite Justice Department approval, and in a highly irregular move, Ms. Villafana subpoenaed the investigator/a

erating an unlicensed money-transmitting business (18 U.S.C. § 1960), though Mr. Epstein never had such a business. See August 31, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to Ross (reciting, in a target letter to one of Mr. Epstein's employees, that the investigation concerns "suspected violations of federal law, inclu

overnment could always find a way to indict Mr. Epstein even well after he completed the sentence required of him under the NPA. See United States' Response to Court's Order Requesting Position on Defendant's Motion to Stay, fn. 5, pp. 14-15. Moreover, Ms. Villafana served written notice on Mr. Epstein's counsel t

36-CIV-MARRAIJOHNSON Attorney for United States A. Marie Villafana U.S. Attorneys Office 500 S. Australian Ave., S

RRAIJOHNSON Attorney for United States A. Marie Villafana U.S. Attorneys Office 500 S. Australian Ave., S

INSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution. (DE 41). On September 8, 2010, the Court entered an Order administratively closing this case in light of related

ecution agreement" and the USAO-SDFLA and counsel for the Jane Does, on numerous matters related to Jeffrey Epstein, including contacts with AUSAs "Marie Villafana and Dexter Lee." DE 41 at 3. The Government's filings frame the issue before the Court as to whether the "Government was obligated, under 18 U.S.C.

ey Epstein, including contacts with AUSAs "Marie Villafana and Dexter Lee." DE 41 at 3. The Government's fi

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

ecution agreement" and the USAO-SDFLA and counsel for the Jane Does, on numerous matters related to Jeffrey Epstein, including contacts with AUSAs "Marie Villafafia and Dexter Lee." DE 41 at 3. The Government's filings frame the issue before the Court as to whether the "Government was obligated, under 18 U.S.C.

ecution Agreement. However, it appears from AUSA Villafana's Declaration that during the summer of 2007, neg

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

orida. DE 13 at 1-2. The Declaration of A. Marie Villafana indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstei

of Florida. DE 13 at 1-2. The Declaration of A. Marie Villafana indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstei

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at 1¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was) an orchestrated decision (between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein) to d

ecution Agreement. However, it appears from AUSA Villafana's Declaration that during the summer of 2007, neg

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The -Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

n addition, appended to the Declaration are AUSA Villafana's letters to the victim's counsel, Bradle J. Edwa

was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA 's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d