Epstein Secrets

d May 31, 2007, to J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc., J. Epstein & Co., Inc.; Epstein Interests; and Financial Thust Company Inc. Dear Ms. Villafana: I write to respond to the subpoenas served on the above entities all dated May 31, 2007. Each of the subpoenas has a substantively identical Attac

DNYGM 02771865 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00258673 EFTA01338177 LAW orrice., or Gmtuan B. LEFGOLTIZT, A. Marie Villaftula, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney Office of the United States Attorney Southern District of Florida June 12, 2007 Page 3 If you have any q

TABILE FAITH A. FRIEDMAN BY FEDERAL EXPRESS A. Marie Villafana, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney Office o

line, Texas, Virginia Arkeratn, Connecticut, Oahe/are, Kentucky. Mahe, Massachusetts, New Hur•Pelhira, New Jersey, New Vont, Ohba, Pennsylvania. Rhode bland, Vermont Woe viTtlia lances, Indiana, Iowa Kamm, .Vii.c.higan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska North Dakota, Oklahoma. South CaroOna, South D

ations that someone would ordinarily do in the course of defending a civil case would constitute a violation of the agreement? (Ex. "A," p.34). Ms. Villafana: No, your honor. I mean, civil litigation is civil litigation, and being able to take discovery is part of what civil litigation is all about.. .. B

h assert that Epstein has undertaken any action in the civil cases that was not discussed with and approved by all Plaintiffs' attorneys (including Maria Villafana, USAO) at the June 12, 2009 hearing with Judge Marra and as set forth in the transcript (supra); and also found to be appropriate as set forth in t

esses. Thus, Epstein has a Sixth Amendment right to attend the depositions under the Confrontation Clause of the Federal Constitution. Christian v. Rhode, 41 F.3d 461, 465-66 (C.A. Ariz. 1994). See also, Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012, 1015, 108 S.Ct. 2798, 2800, 101 L.Ed.2d 857 (1988). The Clause "guaran

ations that someone would ordinarily do in the course of defending a civil case would constitute a violation of the agreement? (Ex. "A," p.34). Ms. Villafana: No, your honor. I mean, civil litigation is civil litigation, and being able to take discovery is part of what civil litigation is all about.. .. B

Docket 09/23/2009 Page 7 of 13 Page 7 action in the civil cases that was not discussed with and approved by all Plaintiffs' attorneys (including Maria Villafana, USAO) at the June 12, 2009 hearing with Judge Marra and as set forth in the transcript (supra); and also found to be appropriate as set forth in th

of 13 Page4 Epstein has a Sixth Amendment right to attend the depositions under the Confrontation Clause of the federal Constitution. Christian v. Rhode, 41 F.3d 461, 465-66 (C.A. Ariz. 1994). See also, Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012, 1015, 108 S.Ct. 2798, 2800, 101 L.Ed.2d 857 (1988). The Clause "guara

d May 31, 2007, to J Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc., J. Epstein & Co., Inc.; Epstein Interests; and Financial Trust Company, Inc. Dear Ms. Villafana: I write to respond to the subpoenas served on the above entities all dated May 31, 2007. Each of the subpoenas has a substantively identical Attac

rolina, Texas, Virginia Arkansas, Conneactrt, Delaware, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohlo, Pennsylvania, Rhode land, Vermont West Virginia Illinois, Indiana, lows, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, adenoma, South Carolina, Sout