Epstein Secrets

ors. LOAD-DATE: September 1, 2010 EFTA00191345 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 247-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2014 Page 17 of 22 Local News West Palm Beath. Palm Beach County, Martin at SI. Ludt Counties I The Palm Beach Post I NEWS Source rim .INDUillONFLTRELOIL• CLEANS OUT UP TO 40% OF SLUDGE IN

00 9/09/18/0918epstelnevml Page I of 3 EFTA00191346 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 247-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2014 Page 18 of 22 Local Newt West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Marlin di Si. Lucie Counties I The Palm Beach Post 416/t3 138 PM Ma vary, nry ram Ih novae men or Mead of the prtiardOre that w

ssel are fIghtng lo obtain the 22.mlnLie tape on behalf of Epstein victim Jane Doe. She has Ned one of • dozen pending off cases in fedora! court In West Palm Beech egstral Epstein. A status check Is sat for Thursday In those cases baton U.S. District Judge Kenneth Mena. Doe could have sallied the lawsuit for 1

ed, for example, the work product argument: Disclosure of work-product materials to an adversarywaives the work-product privilege. See, e.g., In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litig., 860 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1988); In re Doe, 662 F2d 1073, 1081-82 (4th Cir. 1981). Even if it shared the com

CKING FORM Party Filing Matter Under Seal On behalf of (select one): Name: JIM= u.S. Attorneys Office Address: 500 S. Australian Ave: Suite 400, Wesl Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: 0 Plaintiff O Defendant Date sealed document filed: 8/31/2007 If sealed pursuant to statute, cite statute: Fed. R. Grim. P.

ect copy of the forging motion was furnished by facsimile and U.S. mail to: Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West-Palm Beach, FL 33401. gC: 44 OS ROY BLACK, ESQ. Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein ?tit Ile...LeneA nein Black srcbmck. Kornsparl & Stumpf EFTA00179082 U.S.

s in opposition to enforcement of the subpoena.' These are rights personal to Epstein, and the government would no doubt be the first 2 Lanebrd v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 513 F.3d 1121 (2d Cir. 1975), on which the government relies. Response at 37, concerned a motion to quash a trial subpoena duces tecum issued by th

s' Rights Act by signing the federal non-prosecution agreement in 2007 without notifying the victims Their case is pending in U.S. District Court in Wesl Palm Beach. The 24-page published opinion says U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra did not err in his June 2013 ruling, when he ordered the correspondence turne

use plea discussions are not confidential: Disclosure of work-product materials to an adversary waives the work-product privilege. See, e.g., In re Chrysler Motors Corp. Overnight Evaluation Program Litig., 860 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1988); In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081-82 (4th Cir. 1981). Even if it shared the co