Epstein Secrets

o 18 contingency fee contracts, they're asking for 19 language on it I have a copy of it 19 every communication between any member of the 20 Mr. Farmer, with his motion for 20 firm, and they throw Rothstein in just to make it 21 protective order, would not agree to that, but if 21 sexy, about thes

, Document 685, have a 20 protective order that was entered with Mr. Schera's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on. 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the case with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is

o 18 contingency fee contracts, they're asking for 19 language on it I have a copy of it 19 every communication between any member of the 20 Mr. Farmer, with his motion for 20 firm, and they throw Rothstein in just to make it 21 protective order, would not agree to that, but if 21 sexy, about thes

, Document 685, have a 20 protective order that was entered with Mr. Schera's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on. 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the case with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is

ilege and do a 11 against Brad Edwards individually, and it was 12 privilege log. 12 against one of the claimants, 12A individually. 13 Now, Mr. Farmer's office on behalf of 13 '11W COURT: So It's not against the debtor 14 LM wants to do that We don't think Mars 14 estate. 15 appropriate. We thi

Document 685, have a 20 protective ceder that was entered with Mr. Scherer's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the cue with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is t