Epstein Secrets

M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. srumpt. MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED L

07743 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

M. SREBNICK Scott A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED L

13267 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

M. SREBNICK Scow A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STumett MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED

94814 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by

Esq. Robert Senior, Esq. Black. Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00183811 ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK Scan A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4° Street Miami, FL 33132 BLACK SREBNICK KOR

83860 addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by