Epstein Secrets

lsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Estein Farmer , Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL

fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. Sse Lg., DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 (1989Xdisclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing parties t

NSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 6 Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave. Suite #2 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 559 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/

ee infra. Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of 4 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 559

ian Avenue South Suite 1400 Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL

Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials 2 Because of the relief sought in this Rule 4 Appeal, Epstein's civil lawyers have not obtained a cop

outh.net Counsel for £?.efendant Jeffrey Estein Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman,PL

t fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. See M·, DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 ( 1989)( disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing partie