7
Total Mentions
7
Documents
102
Connected Entities
Surname or name fragment in documents
t fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. See M·, DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 ( 1989)( disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing partie
ee infra. Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of 4 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 559
Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials 2 Because of the relief sought in this Rule 4 Appeal, Epstein's civil lawyers have not obtained a cop
documents under seal for in camera review by a neutral and detached magistrate or by court-appointed special masters, see, e.g., United States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 570-71, 109 S.Ct. 2619, 2629-30, 105 L.Ed.2d 469 (1989); In re Grand July Proceedings, 867 F.2d 539, 540 (9th Cir.1989); In re Impou
Page: EFTA00032868 →EFTA00092688
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 will seek privileged materials in light of the crime fraud exception and U.S. v. Zolin at least in the First Circuit. And I think inevitably, your Honor, that will lead to a -- THE COURT: Motion practice. MR. H. COOPER: Yes. And perha
EFTA00317211
fact that target letters and subpoenas were issued relating to certain financial offenses. Sse Lg., DEs 282 and 283 submitted in camera and U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 (1989Xdisclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing parties t
EFTA00728114
Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing par

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Adam D. Horowitz
PersonAmerican attorney specializing in sexual abuse cases, represented multiple Epstein victims
Isidro Manuel Garcia
PersonPerson referenced in documents
Jack Goldberger
PersonAmerican criminal defense attorney who represented Jeffrey Epstein, partner at Goldberger Weiss P.A. in West Palm Beach, Florida

Bradley Edwards
PersonAmerican attorney who represented Epstein victims, author of Relentless Pursuit
Mermelstein & Horowitz
OrganizationLaw firm (Mermelstein & Horowitz)

Paul Cassell
PersonUnited States federal judge
Michael J. Pike
PersonPerson referenced in Epstein-related documents
Jane Doe
PersonPseudonym for anonymous victims/witnesses in Epstein legal proceedings
Maria Farmer
PersonAmerican visual artist
Favalora
PersonRoman Catholic archbishop

Salt Lake City
LocationCity in and county seat of Salt Lake County, Utah, United States and the capital of Utah
Robert D. Critton
PersonIndividual referenced in Epstein legal documents
Zumpe
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
Second Circuit
OrganizationU.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Stuart S. Mermelstein
PersonAttorney involved in Jeffrey Epstein legal matters.
Jaffe
PersonSurname reference in Epstein financial and legal documents

Alan Dershowitz
PersonAmerican lawyer, author, and art collector (born 1938)

Harvey Weinstein
PersonAmerican film producer and sex offender (born 1952)