Epstein Secrets

Nathan INNlucfwl ve t N.A. Pro erty, Inc iddtiL0elcACIr EFTA00183021 Nowak, Martin New Albany Country Newman, Larry Esq. Ciatman, Bob Ovitz, Michael All ( Man TWIT G,00p Packer, Mark Pagano, Joe idn P man ltzhak Pete PILOTAWMATION • "D iv' EFTA00183022 Quinn Thomas H. Venable lnw Irmo

Assocs s wa Harrods Limited Holland & Holland Jackson Stops Int n John Hobbs LW glia mos Martin Tim

Sar« Pm Kerry for Presdent Kessler, Jack Kincaid, Kristina ,.m,,., I So<ref Kosslyn, Steve EFTA00183019 imtrAavistetienitt Leese, Nick so Leach, Robin 852-813-0180 Ron Shulman Lundberg Marc MOTO) Mast Industries Pres John Welch Mast Industries - Milan McMillen, C. Thomas Chairman McMi

elements 1 the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Jackson Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61

reement [2] Leach argues that the government's advocacy for the § 4B1.5(a) enhancement breached the plea agreement. The government stipulated that Leach's base offense level was 24, but the enhancement, if applied, would have increased Leach's offense level to 34. Leach further contends that becaus

ommerce to attempt to persuade, induce, and entice a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). In sentencing Leach, the district court declined to apply enhancements advocated by the government under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a) or, alternatively, under § 4B1.5(b). Leac

9.204 is applicable. See DE 242, p.15; Carson v. Jackson, 466 So.2d 1188, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); and D

lau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491,494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Moreover

F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11`" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA00079414 U.S. v. Jackson. 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge dropped because no conspiracy possible with undercover agent); U.S. v. Bianchi,

.,,15--T,•4”flot a l tiera a ic.,;(,?„, :-: •.,..ir, :,,t1- : .‘,,,. a V. aka% „.. .:,. . . FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION ' CHARGE U.S. v. Leach, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS Internet Internet chat room conversations with "14 year-old"; arranged to meet for sex; 2422(b); 2423(b); 2253 (criminal