Epstein Secrets

HAEL). PIKE HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA DAVID YAREMA 1FLORIDA BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER. 2ADMITTED TO

IED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER. 2ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLOR.I DA AND COLORADO Sent by E.Mail and U.S. Mail Stuar

way or he could have negotiated that 4' way with the U.S. Attorney's Office. And they want to impose 5 their second though

's attorneys sought a global resolution of the matter. The United States subsequently agreed to defer federal prosecution in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, so long as certain basic preconditions were met. One of the key objectives for the Government was to preserve a federal remedy for the young girls

rney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation. Fs 4. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("the Office") entered into negotiations to resolve the investigation. At that time, Mr. Epstein had been char

of the federal investigation. EFTA00014147 --- PAGE BREAK --- 3. As explained above, one of the terms of the agreement deferring prosecution to the State of Florida was securing a federal remedy for the victims. In October 2007, shortly after the agreement was signed, four victims were contacted and these provis

HT_013323 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

HT_013323 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

ay have civil damages claims against Mr. Epstein. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (jointly

the litigation of his abuse of process claim against Edwards. For support, he relies primarily on the decision of Wolfe v. Foreman, 2013 WL 3724763 (Fla. 3d DCA July 17, 2013), wherein the Third District found that the litigation privilege barred both an abuse of process claim and a malicious prosecut

HT_010570 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

HT_010570 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

response to probative evidence offered against them.” Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule “is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the conseque

* Associate, Snow, Christensen & Martineau (Salt Lake City, Utah). *** Partner, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). The authors thank Douglas Beloof, Patricia Cassell, Meg Garvin, Jay Howell, James Marsh, and Stephen Twist for their assistance with this Article.

es v. United States, a federal case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, usefully illustrates the issue. *° In that case, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida 22 Td. 33 Td. at 7302 (statement of Sen. Jon Kyl). 34 Compare /8 U.S.C. § 3771(d), with Susan Bandes, Victim S

the time was second in com- mand under Acosta at the U.S. Attor- ney’s Office in Miami — said prosecu- tors resolved the case b

to craft a secret plea deal with the wealthy New York hedge fund manager has come under federal scrutiny. Epstein, who also has homes in Palm Beach, Fla., and New York, lives on Little St. James Island off St. Thomas. In his first public comments on the 10-year-old case, Jeffrey H. Sloman who at the