Epstein Secrets

ictim of a violation of lenumemtod $04)(1011x of Title l8) and who suffers personal injury as a m utt of such violation ...may sue In any oppropioto United Stales 011trint Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, includingii reasonable attorney's fee." toot U

litigant. to contest allegations made against him seem to contradict the principles of justice and fairness that fire embedded in the tenets of the United Slates Attorney's Office. I also assert that on both a principled and practical level. the mere involvement of your Office in the matter with respect to

NETT MIAMI • F00 LAUDERDALE • WraT PALM UfA01 • 5T. PETER5OLMO 3067800201 December 7, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman First Assisiam United States Attorney United Stales Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jeff: 1-(466 P.002/004 F-016 Callnac) 5810 FIALA FouNi0arni nowt 130

d victims. This letter is meant to assist you in performing your duties by providing you with background information regarding the agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein and the duties that the attorney representative will have to perform. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney

e Petitioners have not been attempting to negotiate with the government for more than 30 months. As set forth in the Procedural I Iistory Section of the United States' Opposition to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victim Rights Act ("CVRA"), at the last hearing on the Pet

reached at - Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Citigroup Center, 153 East 53rd Street, Thank you again for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, cc: AUSA A. By: United States Jeffrey First Assistant United States Attorney ttomey Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000554 EFTA00184842 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM

As noted above, OPR is investigating the conduct of members of the USAO underlying Judge Marra's Order in the matter of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States. The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(i) broadly, that is, for uses that are "related fairly directly to some identifiable litigation,

dlebrooks IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIAL AND FOR ENTRY OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER I, AUSA A. an attorney for the government as defined by Rule 1(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure hereby applies to the Court for an order au

the planned indictment, the identified victims would have been eligible for restitution and damages under Section 2255. As explained above, one of the United States' interests, which had to be satisfied by the Non-Prosecution Agreement, was providing appropriate compensation to the victims. This provision of the

mpts to attack the agreement that he signed, and I finally will address how our Office intends to proceed.' At the end of 2006, Guy Lewis contacted AUSA A. when he learned that she was handling the federal investigation of Mr. Epstein. He asked to Tetttifith.her sir stated that she believed such a me

mate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that t

approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors.' In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. . of our West Palm Beach branch office to pursue a forrnal criminal investigation. 1 n resulted in the discovery of approximately one dozen addit