Epstein Secrets

izes travel for the purpose of knowingly engaging in unlawful sexual activity with minors. United States Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 638 (3d Cir. 2004); United Stales v Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006). This is the highest level of culpability in the four tier hierarchy of culpability that the Model Pen

ternational travel, left untouched the,standard for domestic travel, and thus underscores the strict standard needed for a prosecution in this area. See United States I Clark, 435 F.3d 1100, 1104- 05 (9°' Cir. 2006). 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000735 EFTA00184609 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-43 Entered o

thern District of Florida February 1, 2007 Page 22 Clause imposes real limitations on Congress's power to criminalize essentially local behavior. See United States' Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000) (Violence Against Women Act exceeded Congressional power under the Commerce Clause or § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment)

Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual

tein plead guilty to a registerable state charge. It appears that there was a misunderstanding at the meeting I had with Messrs. Lourie, Krischer, Goldberger, Lefcourt, Ms. and Ms. Please confirm this with IIII Lourie. Before the meeting, Mr. Krischer, and Ms. a sex prosecutor for 13 years, told us that solici

of Mr. Epstein's state court change of plea hearing. I have reviewed the proposed victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, Mr. Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits, which had been request

we had said. During the meeting between I, had to spend several minutes convincing Barry that it had never been said. e t en to e defense group (Goldberger, Lefcourt, and Lefkowitz) that it had never been said, and they then denied that they had made such a statement to Barry. Since this is going up to DOJ, you m

internal as I tried to deal professionally with opposing counsel. In the midst of all of the post-NPA back-and-forth with Epstein, was the Jane Doe. United States litigation.4 Despite the Office's request to be recused from the case, the Justice Department decided that there was no conflict of interest and I w

re that Mr. Epstein plead guilty to I registerable state char e. It appears that there was I misunderstanding at the meeting I had with Messrs. M, Goldberger, Lefcourt, Ms. and Ms. Belohlavek. . . Before the meeting, Mr. , and Ms. Belohlavek, I sex prosecutor for 13 years, told us that solicitation of I minor, u