Epstein Secrets

k that physical force against the person . . . or another may be used in t the course of committing the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). Post-Johnson v. United Sta , U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), a court might decide differently. See, e.g., Menendez Whitaker, 908 F.3d 467 (9'b Cir. 2018). Even if not a crime

considered for work release. At some point after the NPA was signed, USA Acosta was recused from the Epstein matter. AUSA John McMillan (still at USA0): Early in the investigation, I asked AUSA McMillan if he would serve as co-counsel on the case. Before I joined the West Palm Beach Office, AUSA M

rate contact with Epstein. (See Exhibit A-1.) One of the subpoenaed victims was Individual #28, who is referred to as Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe' United Stales litigation. When approached for an interview, Individual #28 refused to speak with the agents, and I remember S/A Kuyrkendall telling me that she fe

GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIAL THIS MATTER has come before the Court on the United States' Sealed Application for Permission to Disclose Grand Jury Material and for Entry of a Protective Order. The Court has considered the Motion and find

tings. B-103 1/10/20”, Email chain between Myesha Braden and Marie Villafaila regarding meeting on 1/11/2008 B-104 1/14/2008 Marie Villafatia, E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, Jason Richards Myesha Braden Email chain regarding meeting and additional 302s B-105 1/17/2008 Agents compile evidence for Bob Sen

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of Am

ent, UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The ind

Client Privilege Investigative Privilege 6(e) Privacy Act/TVPA/CVRA P-014929 thru P-014933 5/27/2008-5/28/2008 emails between A.M. Villafafia, E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, and J. Richards regarding request for legal analysis of statute of limitations issues under state and federal law Attorney-Client Pri

n to undertake discussion with the State Attorney's Office to ensure compliance with these procedures, which compliance will be necessary to satisfy the United States' interest, pursuant to the Petite policy. In consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty and to provide compensation in the manner describe

undertake discussion with the State Attorney's Office to ensure compliance with these procedures, which compliance will be necessary to satisfy the United States' interest, pursuant to the Petite policy. In consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty and to provide compensation in the manner describe

lrkland•Ellls' on '11/26/2007 01:11:55'. >» EFTA00213368 UNITED STATES vs, JEFFREY EPS I PAN PLEA PROFFER On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt and traveled to the home of Lesley Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena in connection with an investigation pending in the Southe

eized and promptly return this warrant to the duty Magistrate Judge as required by law. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA City and State LINNEA R. JOHNSON United States Ma, 'strata Name and Title of Judicial Of EXHIBIT 13-120 EFTA00225133 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-8067-LRJ IN R

Investigation SEARCH WARRANT CASE NUMBER 08-8067-LRJ TO: E. NESBITT KUYRKENDALL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , and any Authorized Officer of the United States: Affidavit(s) having been made before me by E. Nesbitt Kuvrkendall who has reason to Alliant believe that E] on the person of or Ed on the prem

sh memory cards described in the Application for Search Warrant and for the seizure of the items listed above. FURTHER YOUR AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. E. Nesbitt uyrkendall, Specia Agent Federal Bureau of Investigation Subscribed and sworn to before me this / 7 day of March, 2008 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

that "[w]hether to prosecute and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury are decisions that generally rest in the prosecutor's discretion," United States I. Batchelder, 442 U.S. 114, 124 (1979), and the CVRA explicitly states that "[n]othing in th[e] [Act] shall be construed to impair the prosecutoria

1 in order to obtain information from Jane Doe No. 2. Ex. B; Ex. S,11 6-12. On April 24, 2007, Jane Doe No. 2 was interviewed by FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards and AUSA Marie in the presence of her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq. Ex. C; Ex. R, 5; Ex. S, ¶ 12. Jane Doe No. 2

that "[w]hether to prosecute and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury are decisions that generally rest in the prosecutor's discretion " United States v. Batchelder 442 U.S. 114, 124 (1979), and the CVRA explicitly states that "[n]othing in th[e] [Act] shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial

01 in order to obtain information from Jane Doe No. 2. Ex. B; Ex. S, 6-12. On April 24, 2007, Jane Doe No. 2 was interviewed by FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards and AUSA Marie Villafafia, in the presence of her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq. Ex. C; Ex. R, I 5; Ex. S, q 12. Ja

that "[w]hether to prosecute and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury are decisions that generally rest in the prosecutor's discretion " United States v. Batchelder 442 U.S. 114, 124 (1979), and the CVRA explicitly states that "[n]othing in th[e] [Act] shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial

1 in order to obtain information from Jane Doe No. 2. Ex. B; Ex. S,11[6-12. On April 24, 2007, Jane Doe No. 2 was interviewed by FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards and AUSA Marie Villafafia, in the presence of her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq. Ex. C; Ex. R, 15; Ex. S, ¶ 12. Jan