Epstein Secrets

rk of the Court using CM/ECF. According to the Court's website, counsel for all parties are able to receive notice via the CM/ECF system. Assistant United United States Attorney SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of

of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the R

entified individuals." The letter further proposed that the attorney representative for the victims be instructed that "[Otte details regarding the United States's investigation of this matter and its resolution with Mr. Epstein is confidential. You may not make public statements regarding this matter."" 62. O

espondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto.

etter did not inform the victims of how this applied to them. '66 150. The victim notification letters also state that there was "litigation between the United States and two other victims regarding the disclosure of the entire agreement between the United States and Mr. Epstein." The letters did not explain that

-Prosecution A eement P-014090 thru P-014102 9/13/2007 emails from I to Alex Acosta, and regarding plea to federal charges recommending 18 USC 403 or 1512(d), or 47 USC 223(aX1)(3); response that Epstein was only willing to plead to assault on the plane; and rejection of facts supporting assau

de his soliciting and receiving massages from young girls and young women perhaps as many as four times a day — appears likely to be uncontrollable. Sgs United States v. Minnie' 128 F. App'x 827, 829-30 (2d Cir. 2005) (defendant's alleged sex crimes were "of an addictive sexual nature that cannot be suppressed sim

der registration status. Defense counsel also stated that Epstein traveled extensively over the last eight months and "invariably returned to the to the United States. That inescapable reality emphatically proves he won't flee and entitles him to release — on any and all conditions the Court deems appropriate." Id

Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no conditions could reasonably assure the defendant's presence at trial." See. e.a., Vnited States v. Jackson 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); 18 U.S.C. § 3142. "[T]he constitutional limits on a detention period based on dangerousness to the communit

States v. Abuhamra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual vict

thinking about Hi 3ey -- Yea, I am. I have been spending some (panty time with title 18 looking for niademeenors. Do you want to take a look at 18 USC 403, 18 USC 1512(d), and 4/ USC 223(a)(1)(B) and we can talk about them tomorrow? I know that someone mentioned there being ctivity on an airplane, 1 j

wingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection accon y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Stat ode, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT Z In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the United States, that is, in an aircraft owned by a

State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, "State Attorney's Office") in order to satisfy the United States' federal interest in the investigation and prosecution of his offenses, in accordance with the Justice Department's Petite policy. Epstein understan

ppearance before the federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida. Also during that flight, while in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, the defendant became angry regarding the federal investigation and became verbally abusive and threatening towards his female companion EFTA002137

Subject RE: Hi Jay -- Yes, I am. I have been spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for misdemeanors. Do you want to take a look at 18 USC 403, 18 USC 1512(d), and 47 USC 223(a)(1)(B) and we can talk about them tomorrow? I know that someone mentioned there being activity on an airplane, I

wingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection accon y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Stat ode, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT Z In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the United States, that is, in an aircraft owned by a

State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, "State Attorney's Office") in order to satisfy the United States' federal interest in the investigation and prosecution of his offenses, in accordance with the Justice Department's Petite policy. Epstein understan

ppearance before the federal grand jury in the Southern District of Florida. Also during that flight, while in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, the defendant became angry regarding the federal investigation and became verbally abusive and threatening towards his female companion, EFTA00296

Subject RE: Hi Jay -- Yes, I am. I have been spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for misdemeanors. Do you want to take a look at 18 USC 403, 18 USC 1512(d), and 47 USC 223(a)(1)(B) and we can talk about them tomorrow? I know that someone mentioned there being activity on an airplane, I

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of A

nt, UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Second Supplemental Privilege Log. The in

m Marie Villafafia to Andrew Lourie, Alex Acosta, Jeff Sloman, Rolando Garcia, and Karen Atkinson regarding plea to federal charges recommending 18 USC 403 or 1512(d), or 47 USC 223(a)(1)(B); response that Epstein was only willing to plead to assault on the plane; and rejection of facts supporting assa

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June IS, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of A

nt. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June IS, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Second Supplemental Privilege Log. The in

m Marie Villafafta to Andrew Lourie, Alex Acosta, Jeff Sloman, Rolando Garcia, and Karen Atkinson regarding plea to federal charges recommending 18 USC 403 or 1512(d), or 47 USC 223(aX1XB); response that Epstein was only willing to plead to assault on the plane; and rejection of facts supporting assaul

/ UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June IS, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Second Supplemental Privilege Log. The in

m Marie Villafafta to Andrew Lourie, Alex Acosta, Jeff Sloman, Rolando Garcia, and Karen Atkinson regarding plea to federal charges recommending 18 USC 403 or 1512(d), or 47 USC 223(aX1XB); response that Epstein was only willing to plead to assault on the plane; and rejection of facts supporting assaul

issuade Jane Doe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the T commission of a federal offense; in violation of Tide 18, United State ode, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2. jj COUNT 2 In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the United States, that is, in an airc

Subject RE: Hi Jay -- Yes, I am. I have been spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for misdemeanors. Do you want to take a look at 18 USC 403, 18 USC 1512(d), and 47 USC 223(a)(1)(B) and we can talk about them tomorrow? I know that someone mentioned there being activity on an airplane, I