Epstein Secrets

ictim of a violation of lenumemtod $04)(1011x of Title l8) and who suffers personal injury as a m utt of such violation ...may sue In any oppropioto United Stales 011trint Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, includingii reasonable attorney's fee." toot U

litigant. to contest allegations made against him seem to contradict the principles of justice and fairness that fire embedded in the tenets of the United Slates Attorney's Office. I also assert that on both a principled and practical level. the mere involvement of your Office in the matter with respect to

NETT MIAMI • F00 LAUDERDALE • WraT PALM UfA01 • 5T. PETER5OLMO 3067800201 December 7, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman First Assisiam United States Attorney United Stales Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jeff: 1-(466 P.002/004 F-016 Callnac) 5810 FIALA FouNi0arni nowt 130

d victims. This letter is meant to assist you in performing your duties by providing you with background information regarding the agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein and the duties that the attorney representative will have to perform. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney

e Petitioners have not been attempting to negotiate with the government for more than 30 months. As set forth in the Procedural I Iistory Section of the United States' Opposition to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victim Rights Act ("CVRA"), at the last hearing on the Pet

comnsual; she lied to Mr.. Epstein about her age: she instructed others to lie about their ages: there was no sexual contact between herself and Mr. Lipstein at any lime; and there was never any inducement over the telephone, computer or through any other means of interstate commerce We ask that you cons

December I I. 2007 Page 4 the final agreement was very similar to what was proposed by Ms. in her initial draft agreement on July 31. 2007: the United Stales shall provide F.pstein's attorney's with a list of individuals whom it has identified as victims, as defined in IS U.S.C. f 2255. alter Epsicin has

oth offenses. Additionally, for the sake of fairness and candor, we believe the same language contained in your letter to Judge Davis, stating that Itibe United States takes no position as to the validity of any such claim under this statute," should be included in any proposed letter. Sixth, your letter states th

of an enumerated federal crime. This requires Mr. Epstein to in essence admit guilt, though he believes he did not commit the requisite offense. The United States Attorney Manual ("USAM") 9-27.440, Principles of Federal Prosecution, sets forth' clear r,:quirement when' defendant tenders' pica of guilty but sub

nsensual: she lied to Mr.. Epstein about her age: she instructed others to lie about their ages: there was no sexual contact between herself and Mr. Lipstein at any lime; and there was never any inducement over the telephone, computer or through any other means of interstate commerce We ask that you cons

ent and has been sentenced. Upon the execution of this agreement. the United States. in consultation with und subject to the good faith approval of Lipstein's counsel. shall .elect an attorney representative for these persons. who shall be paid fin by Ipsteiti. tostein's counsel may contact the identifie

erson can be charged with a criminal 39 EFTA01718615 . offense, that is a violation of Florida Statutes Section 794.05; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. COUNT 14 (Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) 49. Paragraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged

ity or process of the prior prosecution. not the sentencing outcome. Second, the state plea agreement offered was not "manifestly inadequate" tinder U.S.A.M. § 9- 2.03ID. indeed, the only real difference hews= the state and federal plea proposals was whether Mr. Epstein served his sentence in jail or comm

n to undertake discussion with the $tate Attorney's Office In ensure compliance with these procedures, which compliance will be necessary to satisfy the United States' interest. pursuant to the Perire policy. We reiterate that this case was at heart a local matter that was being fully addressed by the state crimi

and that ease has since been distinguished as well. B. Ms. Prompted An Unduh• Invasive lInvestiention Of Mr. Epstein. Ms. s investigation of Mr. Lipstein raises serious questions. Despite the fact that she was mac aware of the inaccuracies in the P131'lis Probable Cause Affidavit, she chose to includ

to undcdakc discussion with the Slate Attomey's Office Ia custom caswpiiiiitim with these procedures. which compliance will be necessary to satisfy the United States' intero.t, pursuant to the Petite policy. We reiterate that this case was at heart a local mutter that was being billy addressed by the state crimi

ugh such misconduct was, as we contend it is, inextricably intertwined with the credibility of the accusations being made against Mr. Epstein by the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (''USAO"). Moreover. CEOS did not assess the terms of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement now in effect, nor did CEOS revi

ch and every term of Mr. Epstein's State plea, including the exact state charges to which Mr. Epstein plead guilty; the time-frame within which Mr. Lipstein must enter that state pica and surrender to state olficials; and the amount of time he must spend in county jail. This is particularly true where th

S L LP Jay P I otternWs, P C. loP 11Wr r ly blk Orland can VIA FACSIMILE (303) SM1-4444 Honorable R. Alexander Acosta united States Attorney United Slates Attorney's ()filet Southern District of Florida 99 NE itlh Street Miami. Fla 33132 Dear Alex: nap MIn IARD 'Armen-. Cinarmap Conte, 153 Emit

to undertake discussion with the Slate Attorney's 011ie,: to ensure compliance with these procedures. which compliance will he necessary to satisfy the United Status' interest. pursuant In the Poise policy. We reiterate that this ease was at heart a local matter that was being fully addressed by the state crimin

list of persons who seek reimbursement and make a good faith showing to the Tomei: that they suffered injury as a result of the conduct of Epstein. Lipstein waives his right to contest liability ur damages up to an amount agreed to by Ilse panics for any settlements entered into by the Trustee. Eivaenrs

ugh such misconduct was, as we contend it is, inextricably intertwined with the credibility of the accusations being made against Mr. Epstein by the United States Attorney's Office in Miami ("USAO"). Moreover: CEOS did not assess the terms of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement now in effect, nor did CEOS revie

CW. CEOS made clear that it did not do so. indeed. est.:C.)5 declined to es:Amine several of the more troubling aspects ne dic investigation of Mr. Lipstein. in,:ladiar the deliberate kick to the 1V,',r York Times of numennts highly contidemial aspects u' Ilse inn:Sligatitin Iler.011:111011:: heitcec

mate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that t

nsensual: she lied to Mr.. Epstein about her age; she instructed others to lie about their ages: there was no sexual contact between herself and Mr. Lipstein at any time; and them was never any inducement over the telephone, computer or through any other means of interstate commerce We ask that you consi