Epstein Secrets

k that physical force against the person . . . or another may be used in t the course of committing the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). Post-Johnson v. United Sta , U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), a court might decide differently. See, e.g., Menendez Whitaker, 908 F.3d 467 (9'b Cir. 2018). Even if not a crime

considered for work release. At some point after the NPA was signed, USA Acosta was recused from the Epstein matter. AUSA John McMillan (still at USA0): Early in the investigation, I asked AUSA McMillan if he would serve as co-counsel on the case. Before I joined the West Palm Beach Office, AUSA M

rate contact with Epstein. (See Exhibit A-1.) One of the subpoenaed victims was Individual #28, who is referred to as Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe' United Stales litigation. When approached for an interview, Individual #28 refused to speak with the agents, and I remember S/A Kuyrkendall telling me that she fe

GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIAL THIS MATTER has come before the Court on the United States' Sealed Application for Permission to Disclose Grand Jury Material and for Entry of a Protective Order. The Court has considered the Motion and find

Lefkowitz requesting draft to include 403 in lieu of 1512 .1() 9/14/2007 A. Marie Villafatia, A. Acosta , R. Garcia, A. Lowrie, K. Atkinson, S. Ball J. Sloman Email re finalizing documents 46 Privileged Confidential Page 15 of 51 Contains 6(e) Material EFTA00225442 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIM

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America,

espondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto.

. Garcia, A. Lourie re negotiation strategy; ■ 9/14107 e-mail from A. Marie Villafana to J. Sloman, A. Acosta, R. Garcia, A. Lourie, K. Atkinson, S. Ball re proposed plea agreement and Information; ■ 9/14/07 e-mail from A. Marie Villafaiia to J. Sloman, A. Acosta, A. Lourie, R. Garcia, K. Atkinson,

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of Am

ent, UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The ind

illafafia) Attorney-Client Privilege Investigative Privilege P-014979 thru P-014980 6/23/2008 emails between A.M. Villafafia, A. Fernandez, and S. Ball (USAO staff) regarding scheduling of grand jury time for indictment presentation and witness testimony (Information regarding unrelated grand jury

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08.80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America,

espondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto.

216-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2013 Page 5 of 14 Bates Ranee Description strategy: • 9/14107 e-mail from to A. Acosta, re negotiation • S. Ball re proposed plea agreement and Information; • 9/14107 e-mail from A. Acosta, re plea negotiations; 9/13107 e-mail from to S. Ball, re indic

e)(3)(E); Court Inherent Power to Release; Proper Victim's Petition; CVRA-authorized release; Material Severable Box #3 P-012089 Thru P-012129 United States' Response to Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel 6(e) Inadequate Log; No Factual

rcia, A. Laurie re negotiation strategy; ■ 9/14/07 e-mail from A. Marie Villafafia to J. Sloman, A. Acosta, R. Garcia, A Laurie, K. Atkinson, S. Ball re proposed plea agreement and Information Page 53 of 69 EFTA00208735 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 P

mail chain from Jeff Sloman to Andrew Oosterbaan, Marie Villafana, and Alex Acosta regarding Epstein meeting 8/ 7/ 200- Reply of Jeffrey Epstein to United States' Response to His Motion to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel and Sealed Document Tracking Form 8/8/2007 Andre

Tiefkowitz recittesting draft to include 403 in lieu of 1512 49 9/14/2007 A. Marie Villafaria, A. Acosta, R. Garcia, A. Lourie, K. Atkinson, S. Ball J. Sloman Email re finalizing documents Privileged Confidential Page 15 of 51 Contains 6(i ) \ I a t ria I EFTA00224957 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION T

counsel appearing on the attached service list. /s Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attorney II EFTA00191209 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 4 United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Garcia, A. Lourie re negotiation strategy; ■ 9/14/07 e-mail from A. Marie Villafafia to J. Sloman, A. Acosta, R. Garcia, A. Lourie, K. Atkinson, S. Ball re proposed plea agreement and Information; ■ 9/14/07 e-mail from A. Marie Villafafia to J. Sloman, A. Acosta, A. Lourie, R. Garcia, K. Atkinson,

andatory for wire fraud only if the government exercises its discretion to seek such forfeiture. See 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c); Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a); United States v. Liquidators of European Fed. Credit Bank, 630 F.3d 1139, 1144 (9th Cir. 2011) (describing procedure for forfeiture). "[T]he Government retains b

arcia, A. Lourie re negotiation strategy; ■ 9/14/07 e-mail from A. Marie Villafafia to L Simian, A. Acosta, R. Garcia, A Lourie, K. Atkinson, S. Ball re proposed plea agreement and Information Page 53 of 69 EFTA00179675 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 P