Epstein Secrets

United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States v. Okun, No. 08-132, 2009 WL 790042, at '2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2009) ("[T]he Fifth 8 EFTA00205698 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on F

We do not look at one word or term in isolation, but instead we look to the entire statutory context.") (citation omitted). The Court also rejects the United States' argument that pre-charge CVRA rights could impair prosecutorial discretion and decision-making. Any encroachment into the prosecutors' discretion i

Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49), Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (DE 50), and Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79).1 All motions are fully briefed and ripe for review, and the Court

United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States v. Okun, No. 08-132, 2009 WL 790042, at '2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2009) ("[T]he Fifth 8 EFTA00205851 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on F

We do not look at one word or term in isolation, but instead we look to the entire statutory context.") (citation omitted). The Court also rejects the United States' argument that pre-charge CVRA rights could impair prosecutorial discretion and decision-making. Any encroachment into the prosecutors' discretion i

Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49), Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (DE 50), and Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79).1 All motions are fully briefed and ripe for review, and the Court

See, e.g., United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417 n.5 2008) (discussing victims' "ability to seek pre-prosecution relief' under the CVRA); United States v. Okun, No. 08-132, 2009 WL 790042, at '2 (M. Va. Mar. 24, 2009) ("[T]he Fifth 8 EFTA00622800 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD

We do not look at one word or term in isolation, but instead we look to the entire statutory context.") (citation omitted). The Court also rejects the United States' argument that pre-charge CVRA rights could impair prosecutorial discretion and decision-making. Any encroachment into the prosecutors' discretion i

Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49), Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (DE 50), and Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79).1 All motions are fully briefed and ripe for review, and the Court