Epstein Secrets

and placed in the public portion of the court file O Destroyed 0 Returned to the party or counsel for the party, as identified above A`tancy for: United Stales of Vifierica EFTA00179092 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-64 AND

ry on September 18, 2007. However, 'Witness William Riley did not file an initial motion to quash the grand jury subpoenas, but did file a Reply to the United States' Response to the Intervenor's Motion to Quash. Accordingly, the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised b

vestigation of these crimes involving the sexual exploitation of minors. The Supreme Court has routinely recognized the grand jury's unique role in the United States' criminal justice system. The grand jury "belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Go

FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07-103(WPB) UNDER SEAL ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the United States of America's Motion for Permission to File a supplemental Ex Parte Affidavit in support of its Response to the Motion to Quash. Upon review of the motion, it i

84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07-103(WPB) UNITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS UNDER SEAL EFTA0017908

without being forced to disclose the status of the grand jury investigation and the matters occurring before the grand jury to Epstein. Pursuant to the Local Rules, the undersigned has conferred with counsel for Intervenor Epstein, who has advised that he opposes the granting of this motion. WHEREFORE, the Uni

ank you. From: (USAFLS) [ Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:37 PM To: Cc: rS); Brad Edwards ( ); Paul Cassell Subject: Proposed Order, Jane Does I. United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed

er, Jane Does I. United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so much. EFTA00209596

To: Cc: rS); Brad Edwards ( ); Paul Cassell Subject: Proposed Order, Jane Does I. United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so mu

, Jane Does I United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so much. EFTA00208570

dwards ([email protected]); Paul Cassell Subject: Proposed Order, Jane Does I United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so mu

rder,.Jane Does United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so much. EFTA00209384

rad Edwards ([email protected]); Paul Cassell u : rropasea order,.Jane Does United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so mu

008. After Epstein’s June 30, 2008 state court pleas, she sent out substantially similar notification letters to two victims who resided outside of the United States. 222 We will make our best efforts to ensure you are accorded the rights described. Most of these rights pertain to events occurring after

ts against Epstein, brought in the same district, were transferred to the same judge as “related cases,” as a matter of judicial economy pursuant to the Local Rules. As the parties agreed on settlements in those civil cases, they were dismissed.384 Several of the victims who had settled their civil cases file