Epstein Secrets

other instances where 5 counsel other than myself, not in the civil aspects, where 6 allegations have been made and letters have been sent by the 7 United States suggesting that there's been a violation of the 8 NPA. And under those circumstances, some notification was 9 provided. 10 THE COURT: Did it have

1 until 37:23 urge 22:9 use 10:25 11:8 20:24 23:11 28:25 40:11 used 28:19 U.S 2:15 4:10 7:1,9 8:6 12:8,12 16:16 26:19 27:4,18,19 43:5,11,25 U.S.A 2:16 U.S.0 33:7 various 3:1 1025 very 4:21 5:711:1,2 11:20 12:21 16:19 16:24 17:12,12 23:11 29:4 32:1 35:18 38:10 40:18 42:2 43:18 44:14 Via

tact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: Colonel Michael Gauger Chief, Northern Division I EFTA00232797 EFTA00232798 U.S. Department ofJustice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida VIA HAND

not, as alleged, refuse "to fulfill promptly Mr. Epstein's obligation to secure the services of an attorney representative for the victims." It was the United States' obligation to select a suitable attorney representative, subject to the good faith approval of Mr. Epstein's counsel. See Agreement, ¶ 7. Mr. Epste

ocuments, we presented you with your own email that acknowledged the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See July 3, 2008 Email from Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated pris

June 15 at pg 2, refuse "to fulfill promptly Mr. Epstein's obligation to secure the services of an attorney representative for the victims." It was the United States' obligation to select a suitable attorney representative, subject to the good-faith approval of Mr. Epstein's counsel. See NPA ¶ 7. Mr. Epstein's cou

ge 8 own email in which you acknowledged the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated pris

ttorney representative for the victims." Exhibit 1, June EFTA00213042 Ms. A. Marie =., Esq. June 19, 2009 Page 6 15, 2009 Letter at 2. It was the United States' obligation to select a suitable attorney representative, subject to the good-faith approval of Mr. Epstein's counsel. See Exhibit 2, NPA ¶ 7. Indee

h you had previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we ve no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated prisone

y representative for the victims." Exhibit 1, June EFTA00234496 Ms. A. Marie Villafana, Esq. June 19, 2009 Page 6 15, 2009 Letter at 2. It was the United States' obligation to select a suitable attorney representative, subject to the good-faith approval of Mr. Epstein's counsel. See Exhibit 2, NM ¶ 7. Indeed

previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

y representative for the victims." Exhibit 1, June EFTA00194724 Ms. A. Marie Villafana, Esq. June 19, 2009 Page 6 15, 2009 Letter at 2. It was the United States' obligation to select a suitable attorney representative, subject to the good-faith approval of Mr. Epstein's counsel. See Exhibit 2, NPA 17. Indeed

previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafana to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the (work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso

vices of an attorney representative for the victims." Exhibit 1, June EFTA00183770 Ms. Esq. June 19, 2009 Page 6 15, 2009 Letter at 2. It was the United States' obligation to select a suitable attorney representative, subject to the good-faith approval of Mr. Epstein's counsel. See Exhibit 2, NPA ¶ 7. Indee

h you had previously acknowledged that the sheriff had discretion in the matter. See Exhibit 24, July 3, 2008 Email from Assistant U.S. Attorney to Michael Gauger ("If Mr. Epstein is truly eligible for the [work release] program, we have no objection to him being treated like any other similarly situated priso