Epstein Secrets

ant had successfully adjusted to pris- op, was genuinely interested m several reli- gions, and filed grievances for entirely le- gitimate purposes. U.S.C.A. Const.Amends. 1, 5. [33] Constitutional Law 92 4 1170 92 Constitutional Law 92X First Amendment in General 92X(B) Particular Issues and Applic-

U.S. 225, 95 S.Ct. 2160, 45 L.Ed.2d 141, 20 Fed.R.Serv.2d 547 (Cite as: 422 U.S. 225, 95 S.O. 2160) Supreme Court of the United States Reversed. UNITED ST ES, Petitioner, Robert Lee NOBLES. No. 74-634. Argued April 23, 1975. Decided June 23, 1975. Defendant was convicted in the United States District

rk an implied waiver of all confidential communications on the same subject mat- ter. Accord von Bulow, 82$ F.2d at 102-03; Yankee Atomic Elec. Co. I. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 306, 316 (2002). The rationale behind our holding is self-evident. When an attorney participates in an extrajudicial meeting or nego

. 0042201 23 EFTA00177962 Page I of 55 Westlaw Page I 531 F.3d 197 (Cite as: 531 F.3d 197) United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. UNITED STATES America, Appellee, Donald FELL, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 06-2882-cr. Argued: June 27, 2007. Decided: June 27, 2008. Background: Defendant was con

s Reversed. UNITED ST ES, Petitioner, Robert Lee NOBLES. No. 74-634. Argued April 23, 1975. Decided June 23, 1975. Defendant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Central Dis- trict of California of bank robbery and the Court of Appeals, 501 F.2d 146, affumed in part, reversed in part,

er a particular plea is desirable, since "[e]ffective assistance of counsel includes counsel's informed opinion as to what pleas should be entered." United Stalest Pillar, 416 F. Supp. 887, 889 (S.D.N.Y. 1976); Borial. Keane, 99 F.3d 492, 497 (2d Cir. 1996), citing ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility

in- stance. The court authorized no general `fishing expedition' into the defense files ji or indeed even into the defense 'nvestigat- or's report. a. United States . Wright, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 489 .2d 1181 O 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.a

arose precisely because, in addition to accelerating the time when a Page 19 party could obtain evidentiary matter from his adversary,PNI the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure greatly expanded the nature of the material subject to pretrial disclosure/74 *244 Under the Rules, a **2173 party was, for th

) SERVED BY TITLE STATEMENT OF SERVICE FEES TRAVEL SERVICES TOTAL DECLARATION OF SERVICE' I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United Stales of America that the foregoing information contained in the Return of Semite and Statement of Service Fees Is hue and correct. Executed on DATE Signature of

nts who are unable to pay such costs (28 USC 1825, Rule 17(b) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure)" EFTA01660220 00/00/2000 20:40 FAX 5018021787 USA0 WPB FL 04 • 4 United States District Court SOUTBEItN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 05-02(WPB)-Fri./No.

ubpoenaed. The early voluntary turnover date is prior to September 29. 2006. BY: Sincerely, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ASSISTANT UNITED STATEB-ATTORNEY b6 b7C EFTA01660265 • CERTIFICATION OF BUSINESS RECORDS I, the undersigned, , declare that I am: employed by/associated with in t

ted leave to depart by the court or by an officer acting on behalf of the court b6 (BY) DEPUTY CLERK This subpoena is issued upon application of the United States oE America Isnot applicable, enter - none? b7C DATE: October 19, 2006 Name, Address and Phone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney Assistant U.S. Att

by an officer acting on behalf of the court. CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE: b6 August 2, 2006 b7C This subpoena is issued upon application of the United Staten of America Name, Address and Phone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney 'Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 So. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 334

ed leave to depart by the court or by an officer acting on behalf of the court. This subpoena is issued upon application of the I inited Staten of Amerira I n not applicable, enter "none." DATE: August 28, 2006 Name, Address and Phone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney 'Assistant U.S. Attorney 50

STATEMENT TRAVEL SERVICES b6 TOTAL b7C DECLARATION OF SERVICE . I declare under Statement of Executed penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America Service Fees Is hue and ct_ that the foregoing information contained in the Return of Service and on 2 4 0/ D TE Address of Server ADDITIONAL INFORMAT

ge need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or agency thereof (Rule 45(c), Federal Rules of CIA Procedure; Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) or on behalf of certain indigent parties and criminal defendants who are unable t

AL DECLARATION OF SERVICE' I declare under Statement of Service Executed on penalty of perjury Fees is true and eMoifr iZ n7 under the laws of the United Stales of America correct. that the foregoing information contained in the Return of Service and b b D TE bff‘ FL • _Pr 1. Mah-- Dr. sk no, Address of Server

Rule 45(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2."Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or agency thereof (Rule 45(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) or on behalf of cert

ITIONAL INFORMATION As to who may serve a subpoena and the manner of its service see Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or Rule 45(b), Federal Rules of ovo Procedure. "Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an offi

luding alleged victims), which would necessarily thwart such individuals' rights to assert their constitutional right of privacy as guaranteed under the United States and Florida Constitutions. &2e generally Eisenstadt v. Baird, supra at 454-455 (the right encompasses privacy in ones sexual matters and is not limi

protect the attorneys' mental impressions and to assist the Court in making further determinations as to what information , should be protected by Federal Rules 408, 410, and 502. See supra. Again, as set forth in the Reply attached hereto as Exhibit "B", the USAO and the EFTA00317224 Case 9:08-cv-80119-K