Epstein Secrets

10T1 GEN I l OFFICE OF TH£ SOLICITOR GENERAL OFFICE SOLICI GEN OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFfl, JUSTJ, PROGi EXEWTIVE O"ICE FOil THE UNITED STATB EXEWTI1 O"ICEF UNITED OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION OFH DISPI RESOLI ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMUNITY OIIIENTED CIVIL RIGKTS -- DMS

RAL -- CRIMINAL IIUUAUOI' IN\lfSTlGATlON DIVISION DRUG BUREAU OF tNFCRClMENT -- AOMlfflSTRATION PRISONS EXEQITlVE UNITfD STATB Ol'RCEFOR -- UNITED STATl'S MARSHALS SERVICE ATTOIINEYS UNITED U.S.NATIONAL STATES -- CENTIIAL BUREAU ATTORNEYS INT1'RPOI. IUIIIAU OF OfFKEOl' THE Al.<Oo<OI., -- FED

fice for the Northern District of Georgia. 7 United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Criminal Chief Managing Assistant United Stales Attorney West Palm Beach Office Assistant United States Attorney - - - -- May 23, 2006 i"' USAO opens federal • '-)~i:t~·tt:ier~~: F1IIiia U

strict of Georgia. 7 United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Criminal Chief Managing Assistant United Stales Attorney West Palm Beach Office Assistant United States Attorney - - - -- May 23, 2006 i"' USAO opens federal • '-)~i:t~·tt:ier~~: F1IIiia USAO Roles and Responsibilities in

the planned indictment, the identified victims would have been eligible for restitution gad damages under Section 2255. As explained above, one of the United States' interests, which had to be satisfied by the Non-Prosecution Agreement, was providing appropriate compensation to the victims. This provision of "Ele

nal Section. By that time, our Office had already received a proposed initial indictment package, which had been reviewed by the supervisors in our West Palm Beach Office and by attorneys with the Justice D artment's ChildStation and Obscenity Section, but which was awaiting review by Mr. d FAUSA The Office deferre

the planned indictment, the identified victims would have been eligible for restitution Ilk damages under Section 2255. As explained above, one of the United States' interests, which had to be satisfied by the Non-Prosecution Agreement, was providing appropriate compensation to the victims. This provision of the

nal Section. By that time, our Office had already received a proposed initial indictment package, which had been reviewed by the supervisors in our West Palm Beach Office and by attorneys with the Justice Department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, but which was awaiting review by Mr. Menchel and FAUSA Slo

the planned indictment, the identified victims would have been eligible for restitution and damages under Section 2255. As explained above, one of the United States' interests, which had to be satisfied by the Non-Prosecution Agreement, was providing appropriate compensation to the victims. This provision of the

nal Section. By that time, our Office had already received a proposed initial indictment package, which had been reviewed by the supervisors in our West Palm Beach Office and by attorneys with the Justice De artment's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, but which was awaiting review by and . The Office deferre

the planned indictment, the identified victims would have been eligible for restitution and damages under Section 2255. As explained above, one of the United States' interests, which had to be satisfied by the Non-Prosecution Agreement, was providing appropriate compensation to the victims. This provision of the

nal Section. By that time, our Office had already received a proposed initial indictment package, which had been reviewed by the supervisors in our West Palm Beach Office and by attorneys with the Justice Department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, but which was awaiting review by Mr. Menchel and FAUSA Slo