Epstein Secrets

telephon·e, she declined to· d1scuss Epstein. - Nadia Marcinkova1 23, whose family in Yugoslavia Epstein paidmoneyto so that he could bring her to the United States to· be his "sex: sla.,ve;" two teenage girls· tplci police. One. gitl told :polite that Epstein instructed. Marciriko:va a:rtd het to kiss and have

ive co.uri.sel iri this matter." Marra quotedan equally pleasant note then-Pg.lrp ]?each County State Attorney 13;ircy Ifrischer sent to Assi~tc1nt U .S, Attorney Marie Viilafana:, who was the lead prosecutor in Epstein's case. "Glad We could get this worked out for feel.son~ l won't put in wrhing,

a, believing he would prosecute Epstein. He didn't. Reiter said he was heartened that 13 years later, Epstein will finally face justice. "Thankfully, U. S. Attorney Berman and the other authorities in New York have the good judgment to investigate and prosecute Epstein in the way that should have occurre

r grand jury proceedings because of the exceptional public interest in this case and the compelling circumstances supporting transparency. Carlson v. UnitedStates, 837 F.3d at 766 (“a district court has the inherent power to disclose [grand jury] materials in exceptional circumstances and . . . historic importa

t alleges that "dozens" of underage girls were brought into Epstein's mansions for sexual encounters. A few days later, owing to public outcry over the NP A with Epstein entered into by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta, who by then was serving as U.S. Secretary of

ce in question contained what would constitute paradigm opinion work product with the single caveat that the opinions of each counsel, Epstein's and the United States Attorney's were exchanged with each other pursuant to the overall expectation that they were safeguarded from disclosure by the policies of confident

iosk records and copies the pages of a traveler's destinations outside of the United States, or does it simply record exit from and entry back into the United States?3 Moreover, it is unclear whether CBP maintains the Sample Customs Declaration Form for any period of time, which form sets out (i.e., if filled out)

not consider the privacy rights of other alleged victims. As this Court knows, attached to the NP A is a list which delineates alleged victims. Once the NP A was made public, Judge Colbath, with the agreement of the Palm Beach Post, Brad Edwards, Esq. and Spencer Kuvin, Esq. agreed that the "list" would

e on the Judiciary, US. House of Representatives, For an Qrder Authorizilig the Release of Certain Grand Jury Materials, Committee oh the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives v. US. Department of Justice, No. 19-5288 (D.C. Cir. March 20, 2020) (ordering the Trump administration to provide the Hous

rol or house arrest, and was adjudicated as a convicted sex offender required to register twice a year in Florida. Appendix at 8 (Plea Deal), 37. The NP A allowed Epstein to receive immunity from federal s:ex-trafficking charges that could have sent him to prison for life. Former State Attorney Krische

further. Petitioners have no legal right to disclose the Agreement to third parties, or standing to challenge the confidentiality provision. After the United States' response, Exhibit C, this Court entered its Order, Exhibit B, agreeing with the United States' position and maintaining the confidentiality of the N

Docket 06/10/2009 Page 5 of 8 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 5 inclined to grant this Order, then in order to continue to protect the confidentiality of the NP A and to comply with the Court's prior Orders, Exhibit A and Exhibit B, Defendant would agree to allow Plaintiff to file under seal her response and