Docket 06/10/2009 Page 5 of 8 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 5 inclined to grant this Order, then in order to continue to protect the confidentiality of the NP A and to comply with the Court's prior Orders, Exhibit A and Exhibit B, Defendant would agree to allow Plaintiff to file under seal her response and

t alleges that "dozens" of underage girls were brought into Epstein's mansions for sexual encounters. A few days later, owing to public outcry over the NP A with Epstein entered into by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta, who by then was serving as U.S. Secretary of

rol or house arrest, and was adjudicated as a convicted sex offender required to register twice a year in Florida. Appendix at 8 (Plea Deal), 37. The NP A allowed Epstein to receive immunity from federal s:ex-trafficking charges that could have sent him to prison for life. Former State Attorney Krische

not consider the privacy rights of other alleged victims. As this Court knows, attached to the NP A is a list which delineates alleged victims. Once the NP A was made public, Judge Colbath, with the agreement of the Palm Beach Post, Brad Edwards, Esq. and Spencer Kuvin, Esq. agreed that the "list" would