Epstein Secrets

s personally and were always different. She was told that when Epstein was in residence he did not want to encounter the Alessis during his stay in Palm Beach• I then spoke with Mr. Alessi in the presence of his attorney, Donnie Murrell. Mr. Alessi stated that he was employed for eleven years with Mr. Eps

oken with .who told her she was interviewed by detectives. During a sworn taped statement, stated she knew that Hadley Robson worked for Jeff in Palm Bead advised she has been there many times for massages. I asked her if she had formal training in providing massages, stated she did not. VINIMMOadvi

ooter broke down. Additionally she received other gifts from Epstein. Epstein also recommended her to another client who resides at Breakers Row in Palm Beach. The client she was referred to was "Glenn" unknown last name, and his wife, who she provided a massages to. The statement was concluded and placed

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-39 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 6 so novel as to implicate the so-called "dear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. =may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect to 1

dants = a/k/a ' and to perform, among other things, services as personal assistants. 2. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at Palm Beach, Florida, in the Southern District of Florida. EFTA01718439 3. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was the principal owner ofJEGE, INC., a Delaware corpor

e nunnal lintetittnitt!! and rehede lint of state itidit.i.ill matters. II rennin:: thtit Mr. 1.:TINItir:-> courlsti persuade the State Att,riley of Palm Beach Iv istue a criminal information EFTA01718497 vu, us, U. tr). A, :514 r CIII.*:'::20eS 1? i t PAW • GAIAAJLAVE urrium owitowse SIU1.14 6200 41

ot be 2 EFTA01718491 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX @004/006 1004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

ds. Upon information and belief, many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant were taken with hidden cameras set up throughout his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and

Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 8 of 36 B. Masha's Law Does Not Apply To This Case. The presumption against retroactivity and the Ex Post Facto clause preclude application of Masha's Law in this case, where the alleged predicate conduct was completed before 2006. 1. Congress Dld Not Intend

B FL 601 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave, 4th Floor West Pala Beach, Florida 33401 (564) 820-8731 Facsimile (561) 820-8777 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET TO: Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. DATE: August 16,2007 | ‘FAXNO. _232-988.6192 g

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012671 2] 004/006 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX ioe 05/16/08 FRI 11:09 FAX 80 novel as to implicate the so-called “‘clear statement rule,” the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect