Epstein Secrets

VON 15:00 FAX 05/28/2008 09:05 PAX 202 ,'05 JO;08 80‘ 13:23 FAN I 213 080 8500 . , Honorable Mark lip May 19, 2008 Page 3 private practice in South Florida wit sonal relationships to some of the prosecutors involved. Federal prosecutors then leaked hi sensitive information about the case to a New York

ee of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephoF message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe pane Doe #13] too". 20 EFTA00225764 (83) On or about December 30, 2004,

or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (58) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call telephone used by T.M. (59) On or about July 17, 2004, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's

a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. D (56) On or about July 15, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. (57) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant placed one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (58) On or about July 16, 2004

ral, Lleida, Spain. CosmoCaixa Museum of Science, Madrid, Spain. 2008 Calif. State University, Northridge (Richard W. Smith Lecturer). Univ. of South Florida, Doug Nelson Festschrift, Tampa, FL. Arizona State Univ. Law School, Tempe Western Psych Assn, Irvine, CA Nebraska Symposium on Motivation — Emot

ective. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.) Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pp. 157-184. Foster, R.A., Libkuman, T.M., Schooler, J.W., & Loftus, E.F. (1994) Consequentiality and eyewitness person identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 107-121. Loftus, E.F

ing forward to putting this difficult peri- od of his life behind him. He is continuing his longstanding history of science philanthropy both here In South Florida and nationwide." Goldberger had blocked the unsealing by filing court papers asking that the documents stay scaled "to prevent a se- rious imminent

upon conviction, did not require sex offender registration. 3. Jane Doe #1 is a woman with initials C.W., and Jane Doe #2 is a woman with initials T.M. Both were victims of Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. Both Jane Does were identified through the Palm Be