Epstein Secrets

position Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893-CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in November 2009 to face federal criminal charges and civil claims by private investors arising out of what was reported to be a $1.2 Billion Ponzi

egedly misused. See Deposition Transcript of Bradley Edwards dated March 23, 2010; Deposition Transcripts of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR and Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19). 5 EFTA00799343 July 22, 2009 from Ed

t all these defendants. The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to compromise the core values of both state and federal justice systems in South Florida and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the subject of this Com

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BAl2)Toronto Dominion Bank,

ow, trust, and operating accounts. Despite the grossly inordinate amount of funds being rapidly wired in and out of RRA's accounts held at two local South Florida branches, these suspicious account activities inexplicably circumvented several fraud-risk tripwires and avoided detection by TD Bank's internal ba

nspirators 43. Defendant, ROTHSTEIN, is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was one of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.'s founders, its managing partner and CEO. Rothstein is the admitted architect of the Ponzi scheme. On January 27, 2010, Rothstein pled guilty

t all these defendants. The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to compromise the core values of both state and federal justice systems in South Florida and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the subject of this Com

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P. A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Bank

t all these defendants. The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to compromise the core values of both state and federal justice systems in South Florida and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their K‘ e clients who adversely affected by the misconduct that is the subject of this Co

on or about November 11, 2009, ned the approximate amount of $10,085.00; dee (M11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which 2009, contained the approximate amount of $7 (BAI2)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account Holding, which, on or

prison sentence after pleading guilty to five federal charges in the $1.4 EFTA_R1_00483319 EFTA01990636 billion investment fraud. the largest in South Florida history. His scheme relied on investors believing he was raking in millions of dollars in whistle-blower and employment discrimination settlements.

ng to recover funds for Rothstein's victims. The bankruptcy attorneys are suing Boden for the $1 million he received while working at the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm and an additional $36.7 million in damages. • Topics • Trials • Litigation • Bankruptcy • See more topics » o X Financially Distresse

osition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893- CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in November 2009 to face federal criminal charges and civil claims by private investors arising out of what was reported to be a $1.2 Billion Ponzi

ly needed to keep the Ponzi Scheme from unraveling. [Cite Razorback and media reports]; Depositions taken of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR. The court confirmed that there was no legitimate basis for filing Edwards' motion, calling it "devoid of evidence." See Order in

ereto for appellate purposes; 4. That there is currently in excess of Sl0,000,000.0Q of funds clearly belonging to JONES frozen In various banks in South Florida pursuant to prior orders of this and other courts; 5. That these funds are not to be moved under any circumstances absent further order or this Cou

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Bank,

t all these defendants. The Rothstein racketeering enterprise endeavored to compromise the core values of both state and federal justice systems in South Florida and to vindicate the hardworking and honest lawyers and their clients who were adversely affected by the misconduct that is the subject of this Com

November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (33A11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, ' 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Ban